Nicholas Procter

2.9k citations
143 papers · 1.8k indexed · h-index 23

Nicholas Procter

135 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Nicholas Procter
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Clinical Psychology 1.1k
  • Research and Theory 31
  • General Health Professions 748
  • Social Psychology 407
  • Health 144
Replace Shaher H. Hamaideh with:
Shaher H. Hamaideh Jordan
Kathleen R. Delaney United States
Joy Duxbury United Kingdom
Bridget Hamilton Australia
Niels Buus Denmark
Peter Nolan United Kingdom
María Dolores Ruiz‐Fernández Spain
Gary A. Morse United States
Genevieve E. Chandler United States
Lloyd I. Sederer United States
Nicholas Procter relative to Shaher H. Hamaideh Jordan Shaher H. Hamaideh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Shaher H. Hamaideh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas Procter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas Procter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas Procter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas Procter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas Procter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas Procter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas Procter. The network helps show where Nicholas Procter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nicholas Procter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nicholas Procter Line = papers co-authored together Nicholas Procter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20243
2 20247
3 20241
4 20240
5 20233
6 20236
7 20229
8 20226
9 20217
10 20214
11 202172
12 20214
13 20204
14 20198
15 20197
16 201859
17 201739
18 201524
19
Responding to youth suicide: a film for nurses and health workers.
20151
20 201392

About Nicholas Procter

Nicholas Procter is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions and Research and Theory, having authored 143 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migration, Health and Trauma (48 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (33 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (27 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (24 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (15 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (9 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (9 papers) and Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (1.1k citations), Research and Theory (31 citations) and General Health Professions (748 citations). Nicholas Procter has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Miriam Posselt, Monika Ferguson, Amy Baker, John Moss, Jeffrey Fuller, Jane Edwards, Heather McIntyre, Cherrie Galletly, Charlotte de Crespigny and Jane Warland. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, Health & Social Care in the Community, International Journal of Nursing Practice, Psychiatry Psychology and Law and Holistic Nursing Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026