R. M. White
Impact in
- Radiation top 5%
- Nuclear Physics and Applications
- Condensed Matter Physics top 10%
- Rare-earth and actinide compounds
- Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Papers in
- Radiation 14
- Nuclear Physics and Applications 13
-
- Nuclear physics research studies 8
- Co-authors
- N. F. MottThomas A. CarlsonPeter FuldeF. S. RowlandR.O. LaneH.D. KnoxZb́igniew GalusN. d’Ambrumenil
- Journals
- Nuclear Physics A (2 papers)Journal of Applied Physics (2 papers)Nuclear Science and Engineering (2 papers)Medical Physics (1 paper)Journal of the American Chemical Society (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyCzechia
In The Last Decade
R. M. White
28 papers receiving 575 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Radiation 97
- Condensed Matter Physics 111
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 247
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 146
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 98
Countries citing papers authored by R. M. White
This map shows the geographic impact of R. M. White's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. M. White with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. M. White more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by R. M. White
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. M. White. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. M. White. The network helps show where R. M. White may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside R. M. White, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1996 | 7 | |
| 2 | Advances in nuclear data and all-particle transport for radiation oncology | 1994 | 1 |
| 3 | 1992 | 13 | |
| 4 | Evaluation of charged-particle reactions for fusion applications | 1991 | 0 |
| 5 | 1990 | 3 | |
| 6 | 1986 | 8 | |
| 7 | 1985 | 14 | |
| 8 | 1984 | 15 | |
| 9 | 1984 | 8 | |
| 10 | 1983 | 5 | |
| 11 | 1983 | 25 | |
| 12 | 1982 | 19 | |
| 13 | 1981 | 47 | |
| 14 | 1980 | 18 | |
| 15 | 1979 | 12 | |
| 16 | 1975 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1974 | 69 | |
| 18 | 1971 | 112 | |
| 19 | 1970 | 53 | |
| 20 | 1961 | 10 |
About R. M. White
R. M. White is a scholar working on Radiation, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Geochemistry and Petrology, Catalysis and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 29 papers that have together received 610 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nuclear Physics and Applications (13 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (8 papers), Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (6 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (4 papers), Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry (4 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (3 papers), Magnetic Properties of Alloys (2 papers) and Cold Fusion and Nuclear Reactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiation (97 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (111 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (247 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (146 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (98 citations). R. M. White has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include N. F. Mott, Thomas A. Carlson, Peter Fulde, F. S. Rowland, R.O. Lane, H.D. Knox, Zb́igniew Galus, N. d’Ambrumenil, Ralph N. Adams and R. C. Haight. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Physics A, Journal of Applied Physics, Nuclear Science and Engineering, Medical Physics and Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.