J.J. Broerse
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 10%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Oncology
- Cancer Research
- Radiation top 10%
- Co-authors
- J. ZoeteliefE.K.J. PauwelsJacob GeleijnsW. HummelD.W. van BekkumT. VulsmaJan J. M. de VijlderJohan Camps
- Topics
- Radiation Dose and Imaging (8 papers)Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry (8 papers)Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (7 papers)
- Journals
- Physics in Medicine and BiologyEuropean Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular ImagingRadiation Research
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited KingdomItaly
In The Last Decade
J.J. Broerse
18 papers receiving 404 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 193
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 122
- Oncology 74
- Cancer Research 73
- Radiation 57
Countries citing papers authored by J.J. Broerse
This map shows the geographic impact of J.J. Broerse's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.J. Broerse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.J. Broerse more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J.J. Broerse
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.J. Broerse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.J. Broerse. The network helps show where J.J. Broerse may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J.J. Broerse
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J.J. Broerse. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J.J. Broerse based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J.J. Broerse. J.J. Broerse is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 15 | |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 13 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 28 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 274 | |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | Depth-dose measurements of d-T neutrons for radiotherapy applications. | 1 |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | 2 |
About J.J. Broerse
J.J. Broerse is a scholar working on Radiation, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 19 papers that have together received 443 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Radiation Dose and Imaging (8 papers), Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry (8 papers) and Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (193 citations), Radiation (57 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (29 citations). J.J. Broerse has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include J. Zoetelief, E.K.J. Pauwels, Jacob Geleijns, W. Hummel, D.W. van Bekkum, T. Vulsma, Jan J. M. de Vijlder, Johan Camps, A.J.J. Bos and Leo J. Schultze Kool. Their work appears in journals such as Physics in Medicine and Biology, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging and Radiation Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.