D.A. Resler

588 total citations
21 papers, 439 citations indexed

About

D.A. Resler is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Radiation and Aerospace Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, D.A. Resler has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 439 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 8 papers in Radiation and 7 papers in Aerospace Engineering. Recurrent topics in D.A. Resler's work include Nuclear physics research studies (15 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (8 papers) and Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (7 papers). D.A. Resler is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear physics research studies (15 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (8 papers) and Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (7 papers). D.A. Resler collaborates with scholars based in United States, Saudi Arabia and Ireland. D.A. Resler's co-authors include Stewart D. Bloom, Maurice B. Aufderheide, S. M. Grimes, T. N. Massey, Grant J. Mathews, H.D. Knox, K. Griest, M. T. Ressell, R.O. Lane and Grant J. Mathews and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical Review A and Nuclear Physics A.

In The Last Decade

D.A. Resler

20 papers receiving 426 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
D.A. Resler United States 12 406 127 83 80 55 21 439
S. Teige United States 15 473 1.2× 82 0.6× 32 0.4× 166 2.1× 11 0.2× 44 607
Misak Sargsian United States 16 849 2.1× 210 1.7× 38 0.5× 57 0.7× 33 0.6× 56 884
A. Howard United States 13 332 0.8× 101 0.8× 177 2.1× 25 0.3× 69 1.3× 42 489
Z. Chajęcki United States 13 380 0.9× 150 1.2× 63 0.8× 55 0.7× 38 0.7× 33 418
Sarah Wesolowski United States 6 403 1.0× 119 0.9× 36 0.4× 75 0.9× 43 0.8× 6 463
Karl Giboni United States 11 558 1.4× 172 1.4× 78 0.9× 73 0.9× 7 0.1× 25 607
W. Stoeffl United States 9 548 1.3× 208 1.6× 31 0.4× 272 3.4× 19 0.3× 18 585
F. Selonke Germany 12 591 1.5× 43 0.3× 62 0.7× 29 0.4× 19 0.3× 18 631
C. A. Pruneau United States 10 390 1.0× 45 0.4× 53 0.6× 34 0.4× 59 1.1× 49 409
E. M. Friedlander United States 8 221 0.5× 45 0.4× 92 1.1× 22 0.3× 40 0.7× 21 287

Countries citing papers authored by D.A. Resler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D.A. Resler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D.A. Resler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D.A. Resler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D.A. Resler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D.A. Resler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D.A. Resler. The network helps show where D.A. Resler may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of D.A. Resler

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D.A. Resler. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D.A. Resler based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D.A. Resler. D.A. Resler is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Grimes, S. M., et al.. (2003). Level densities for20<~A<~110. Physical Review C. 67(1). 77 indexed citations
2.
Grimes, S. M., et al.. (2001). Are the level densities forr- andrp-process nuclei different from nearby nuclei in the valley of stability?. Physical Review C. 63(6). 30 indexed citations
3.
Kim, Kihong, Logan G. Wright, & D.A. Resler. (2001). Coulomb distortion effects for electron or positron induced (e,e′) reactions in the quasielastic region. Physical Review C. 64(4). 35 indexed citations
4.
Aufderheide, Maurice B., Stewart D. Bloom, Grant J. Mathews, & D.A. Resler. (1996). Importance of (n,p) reactions for stellar beta decay rates. Physical Review C. 53(6). 3139–3142. 21 indexed citations
5.
Aufderheide, Maurice B., Stewart D. Bloom, D.A. Resler, & C. D. Goodman. (1994). Comparison of Gamow-Teller strength inAr37andK37andCl37neutrino cross sections. Physical Review C. 49(2). 678–685. 21 indexed citations
6.
Aufderheide, Maurice B., Stewart D. Bloom, D.A. Resler, & Grant J. Mathews. (1993). Implications of the recentCo59(n,p)59Fe experiment for stellar electron capture rates. Physical Review C. 47(6). 2961–2969. 26 indexed citations
7.
Aufderheide, Maurice B., Stewart D. Bloom, D.A. Resler, & Grant J. Mathews. (1993). Shell-model calculations of Gamow-Teller strength inV51,Fe54, andCo59. Physical Review C. 48(4). 1677–1685. 24 indexed citations
8.
Goodman, C. D., Maurice B. Aufderheide, Stewart D. Bloom, & D.A. Resler. (1992). Comment on ‘‘Is the weak axial-vector current renormalized in nuclei?. Physical Review Letters. 69(16). 2445–2445. 9 indexed citations
9.
Aufderheide, Maurice B., Stewart D. Bloom, D.A. Resler, & C. D. Goodman. (1992). Gamow-Teller strength inA=37 nuclei. Physical Review C. 46(6). 2251–2258. 8 indexed citations
10.
Rozsnyai, Balazs F., Stewart D. Bloom, & D.A. Resler. (1991). Computation of spectral arrays in hot plasmas using the Lanczos algorithm. Physical Review A. 44(10). 6791–6799. 6 indexed citations
11.
White, R. M., et al.. (1991). Evaluation of charged-particle reactions for fusion applications. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas). 13–17.
12.
Resler, D.A.. (1990). VisiCLANG—a visible compiler for CLANG. ACM SIGPLAN Notices. 25(8). 120–123. 15 indexed citations
13.
Knox, H.D., et al.. (1990). Higher excitation levels ofB11via theB10(n,n)B10andB10(n,n′)B10*(0.72, 1.74, 2.15, 3.59, 4.77 MeV) reactions. Physical Review C. 42(1). 190–206. 3 indexed citations
14.
Resler, D.A., H.D. Knox, P. Koehler, R.O. Lane, & G. F. Auchampaugh. (1989). Structure ofC14via elastic and inelastic neutron scattering fromC13: Measurement andR-matrix analysis. Physical Review C. 39(3). 766–782. 10 indexed citations
15.
Resler, D.A., et al.. (1988). Application of the multiple scattering code MACHO to account for several experimental difficulties in deep inelastic neutron scattering data. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 269(3). 607–614. 6 indexed citations
16.
Resler, D.A. & S. M. Grimes. (1988). The nuclear shell model code CRUNCHER. Computers in Physics. 2(3). 65–69. 15 indexed citations
17.
Resler, D.A., R.O. Lane, & H.D. Knox. (1987). Selective sequential 2n decay ofC/emph>14states populated byC13+n. Physical Review C. 35(2). 855–857. 3 indexed citations
18.
Knox, H.D., D.A. Resler, & R.O. Lane. (1987). Reactions leading to the 7Li and 8Li systems: Shell model and R-matrix calculations. Nuclear Physics A. 466(2). 245–279. 23 indexed citations
19.
Koehler, P., H.D. Knox, D.A. Resler, R.O. Lane, & G. F. Auchampaugh. (1986). Structure of 19O from measurement and R-matrix analysis of σ(θ) for 18O(n, n)18O and 18O(n, n′)18O∗(1.98 MeV). Nuclear Physics A. 453(3). 429–462. 7 indexed citations
20.
Koehler, P., H.D. Knox, D.A. Resler, R.O. Lane, & D. J. Millener. (1983). Structure of 12B from measurement and R-matrix analysis of σ(θ) for 11B(n, n)11B and 11B(n, n')11B∗(2.12 MeV), and shell-model calculations. Nuclear Physics A. 394(1-2). 221–244. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026