Countries where authors publish in Nuclear Physics A
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nuclear Physics A. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nuclear Physics A with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nuclear Physics A more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Nuclear Physics A. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nuclear Physics A.
About Nuclear Physics A
The 31.0k papers published in Nuclear Physics A in the last decades have received a total of 745.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Nuclear Physics A usually cover Nuclear and High Energy Physics (28.3k papers), Radiation (98 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysics (247 papers), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (71 papers) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (179 papers) specifically the topics of Nuclear physics research studies (22.2k papers), High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (3.2k papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (2.4k papers), Neutrino Physics Research (262 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (193 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (106 papers), Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (100 papers) and Particle Detector Development and Performance (96 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nuclear Physics A are Fay Ajzenberg-Selove, G. Audi, A.H. Wapstra, Larry McLerran, V. M. Strutinsky, P.M. Endt, E. Oset, G.R. Satchler, Geoffrey Brown and Ulf-G. Meißner.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.