R. Laird
Impact in
- Animal Science and Zoology top 2%
- Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Meat and Animal Product Quality
- Small Animals top 2%
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Papers in
-
- Animal Nutrition and Physiology 12
- Meat and Animal Product Quality 6
-
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies 8
- Co-authors
- William C. Smith (7 shared papers)M. Ellis (4 shared papers)J. P. Chadwick (3 shared papers)J.D. Wood (2 shared papers)C. T. Whittemore (4 shared papers)Foster B. Cady (2 shared papers)M. Enser (1 shared paper)H.J.H. MacFie (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Animal Science (16 papers)Agronomy Journal (2 papers)The Journal of Agricultural Science (1 paper)Meat Science (1 paper)Phytopathology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomItalyChina
In The Last Decade
R. Laird
22 papers receiving 302 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Animal Science and Zoology 215
- Small Animals 143
- Agronomy and Crop Science 77
- Genetics 109
- Nutrition and Dietetics 19
Countries citing papers authored by R. Laird
This map shows the geographic impact of R. Laird's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Laird with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Laird more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by R. Laird
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Laird. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Laird. The network helps show where R. Laird may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 24 scholars most cited alongside R. Laird, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1978 | 57 | |
| 2 | 1969 | 51 | |
| 3 | 1983 | 29 | |
| 4 | 1966 | 27 | |
| 5 | 1983 | 27 | |
| 6 | 1959 | 27 | |
| 7 | 1991 | 25 | |
| 8 | 1981 | 17 | |
| 9 | 1969 | 16 | |
| 10 | 1983 | 13 | |
| 11 | 1983 | 13 | |
| 12 | 1962 | 12 | |
| 13 | 1988 | 10 | |
| 14 | 1979 | 7 | |
| 15 | 1982 | 4 | |
| 16 | 1963 | 4 | |
| 17 | Pratylenchus thornei, a nematode pest of wheat in Sonora, Mexico. | 1970 | 3 |
| 18 | Plan Puebla: an agricultural development program for low-income farmers in Mexico. | 1997 | 3 |
| 19 | 1969 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1959 | 2 |
About R. Laird
R. Laird is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Small Animals, Agronomy and Crop Science, Genetics and Plant Science, having authored 24 papers that have together received 352 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Nutrition and Physiology (12 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (8 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (7 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (6 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (4 papers), Crop Yield and Soil Fertility (2 papers), Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems (2 papers) and Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (215 citations), Small Animals (143 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (77 citations), Genetics (109 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (19 citations). R. Laird has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and China. Frequent co-authors include William C. Smith, M. Ellis, J. P. Chadwick, J.D. Wood, C. T. Whittemore, Foster B. Cady, M. Enser, H.J.H. MacFie, James Robertson and M. E. Castle. Their work appears in journals such as Animal Science, Agronomy Journal, The Journal of Agricultural Science, Meat Science and Phytopathology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.