R. L. C. Ogando
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 10%
- Instrumentation top 10%
- Ecology
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Co-authors
- M. A. G. MaiaL. da CostaP. S. PellegriniC. ChiappiniRicardo P. SchiavonL. A. N. da CostaL. BaruahChristophe Benoist
- Topics
- Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (6 papers)Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (6 papers)Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (4 papers)
- Journals
- The Astrophysical JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyThe Astronomical Journal
- Partner nations
- BrazilUnited StatesItaly
In The Last Decade
R. L. C. Ogando
7 papers receiving 103 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 19
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 99
- Instrumentation 61
- Ecology 11
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 10
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 9
Countries citing papers authored by R. L. C. Ogando
This map shows the geographic impact of R. L. C. Ogando's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. L. C. Ogando with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. L. C. Ogando more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by R. L. C. Ogando
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. L. C. Ogando. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. L. C. Ogando. The network helps show where R. L. C. Ogando may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. L. C. Ogando
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. L. C. Ogando. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. L. C. Ogando based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. L. C. Ogando. R. L. C. Ogando is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 36 | |
| 4 | Line strengths of early-type galaxies. 1 | 10 |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | The Dark Energy Survey Data-Management System: The Processing Framework | 0 |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 31 |
About R. L. C. Ogando
R. L. C. Ogando is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 9 papers that have together received 104 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (6 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (6 papers) and Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (61 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (99 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (10 citations). R. L. C. Ogando has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include M. A. G. Maia, L. da Costa, P. S. Pellegrini, C. Chiappini, Ricardo P. Schiavon, L. A. N. da Costa, L. Baruah, Christophe Benoist, M. R. Becker and Risa H. Wechsler. Their work appears in journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and The Astronomical Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.