The Astronomical Journal

889.8k citations
22.4k papers · · active since 1951

Impact in

    • Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
    • Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
    • Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
    • Astro and Planetary Science
    • Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
    • Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
    • Cosmology and Gravitation Theories

Papers in

    • Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies 9.6k
    • Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena 4.3k
    • Astro and Planetary Science 1.8k
    • Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies 1.8k
    • Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations 519
    • Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae 314
    • Radio Astronomy Observations and Technology 276
    • Astronomy and Astrophysical Research 317

The Astronomical Journal

19.3k papers receiving 785.3k citations

Peers

The Astronomical Journal
Comparison fields: 5 of 171
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 764.9k
  • Instrumentation 6.3k
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 18.8k
  • Numerical Analysis 1.1k
  • Aerospace Engineering 6.8k
Replace Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society with:
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society United Kingdom
Astronomy and Astrophysics Germany
Astrophysics and Space Science United States
Icarus United States
The Astrophysical Journal United States
Advances in Space Research United States
Planetary and Space Science United States
The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series United States
Space Science Reviews United States
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan Japan
The Astronomical Journal relative to Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society United Kingdom Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.5×
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in The Astronomical Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Astronomical Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Astronomical Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Astronomical Journal more than expected).

Fields of papers published in The Astronomical Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Astronomical Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Astronomical Journal.

About The Astronomical Journal

The 22.4k papers published in The Astronomical Journal in the last decades have received a total of 889.8k indexed citations . Papers published in The Astronomical Journal usually cover Astronomy and Astrophysics (19.2k papers), Instrumentation (317 papers), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (241 papers), Aerospace Engineering (224 papers) and Numerical Analysis (24 papers) specifically the topics of Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (9.6k papers), Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (4.3k papers), Astro and Planetary Science (1.8k papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (1.8k papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (519 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (317 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (314 papers) and Radio Astronomy Observations and Technology (276 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Astronomical Journal are Leon B. Lucy, A. U. Landolt, William E. Harris, Ivan R. King, David C. Jewitt, Yoshihide Kozai, Iain Neill Reid, Scott D. Tremaine, John L. Tonry and Jack Wisdom.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact