Mike Jarvis

14.1k total citations
32 papers, 785 citations indexed

About

Mike Jarvis is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Instrumentation. According to data from OpenAlex, Mike Jarvis has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 785 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 12 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 12 papers in Instrumentation. Recurrent topics in Mike Jarvis's work include Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (20 papers), Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (12 papers) and Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (12 papers). Mike Jarvis is often cited by papers focused on Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (20 papers), Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (12 papers) and Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (12 papers). Mike Jarvis collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. Mike Jarvis's co-authors include G. M. Bernstein, Bhuvnesh Jain, Rachel Mandelbaum, Barnaby Rowe, D Dolney, Melanie Simet, J. Zuntz, James Bosch, J. Meyers and D. A. Smith and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Astrophysical Journal and Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

In The Last Decade

Mike Jarvis

29 papers receiving 744 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mike Jarvis United States 13 667 241 180 125 88 32 785
R. Armstrong United States 11 655 1.0× 242 1.0× 167 0.9× 107 0.9× 115 1.3× 24 779
G. Vernardos Netherlands 17 653 1.0× 253 1.0× 171 0.9× 56 0.4× 56 0.6× 40 754
James Bosch United States 7 473 0.7× 186 0.8× 126 0.7× 72 0.6× 83 0.9× 10 560
J. Meyers United States 8 467 0.7× 195 0.8× 120 0.7× 166 1.3× 65 0.7× 29 603
S. L. Bridle United Kingdom 5 682 1.0× 246 1.0× 115 0.6× 145 1.2× 43 0.5× 6 743
Anupreeta More Japan 19 970 1.5× 393 1.6× 155 0.9× 124 1.0× 45 0.5× 57 1.1k
Melanie Simet United States 14 942 1.4× 392 1.6× 166 0.9× 338 2.7× 102 1.2× 19 1.1k
Tomasz Kacprzak Switzerland 12 536 0.8× 161 0.7× 114 0.6× 124 1.0× 105 1.2× 26 653
J. Zuntz United Kingdom 13 742 1.1× 197 0.8× 114 0.6× 283 2.3× 79 0.9× 29 829
G. Covone Italy 23 1.3k 1.9× 535 2.2× 158 0.9× 325 2.6× 73 0.8× 73 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Mike Jarvis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mike Jarvis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mike Jarvis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mike Jarvis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mike Jarvis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mike Jarvis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mike Jarvis. The network helps show where Mike Jarvis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mike Jarvis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mike Jarvis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mike Jarvis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mike Jarvis. Mike Jarvis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hirata, Christopher M., M. Yamamoto, M. A. Troxel, et al.. (2024). Simulating image coaddition with the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope – I. Simulation methodology and general results. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 528(2). 2533–2561. 5 indexed citations
2.
Yamamoto, M., Tianqing Zhang, Christopher M. Hirata, et al.. (2024). Simulating image coaddition with the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope – II. Analysis of the simulated images and implications for weak lensing. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 528(4). 6680–6705. 3 indexed citations
3.
Mandelbaum, Rachel, Mike Jarvis, Robert H. Lupton, et al.. (2023). PSFs of coadded images. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 6. 7 indexed citations
4.
Li, Xiangchong, et al.. (2023). A differentiable perturbation-based weak lensing shear estimator. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 527(4). 10388–10396. 5 indexed citations
5.
Zhang, Tianqing, et al.. (2022). Impact of point spread function higher moments error on weak gravitational lensing – II. A comprehensive study. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 520(2). 2328–2350. 7 indexed citations
6.
Yamamoto, M., M. A. Troxel, Mike Jarvis, et al.. (2022). Weak gravitational lensing shear estimation with metacalibration for the Roman High-Latitude Imaging Survey. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 519(3). 4241–4252. 8 indexed citations
7.
Kovacs, E., Rachel Mandelbaum, Mike Jarvis, & C. W. Walter. (2022). Ellipticity Distribution Bug in cosmoDC2 and SkySim5000_v1.1.1. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research).
8.
Delvecchio, I., E. Daddi, Mike Jarvis, et al.. (2021). The infrared-radio correlation of star-forming galaxies is strongly M?-dependent but nearly redshift-invariant since z ~ 4. Figshare. 7 indexed citations
9.
Léget, P.-F., P. Astier, N. Regnault, et al.. (2021). Improving the astrometric solution of the Hyper Suprime-Cam with anisotropic Gaussian processes. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 650. A81–A81. 3 indexed citations
10.
Hardcastle, M. J., T. W. Shimwell, C. Tasse, et al.. (2020). The contribution of discrete sources to the sky temperature at 144 MHz. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 648. A10–A10. 20 indexed citations
11.
Chang, C., M. Wang, Scott Dodelson, et al.. (2018). A unified analysis of four cosmic shear surveys. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 482(3). 3696–3717. 24 indexed citations
12.
Morabito, L. K., James Matthews, G. Gürkan, et al.. (2018). The origin of radio emission in broad absorption line quasars: Results from the LOFAR Two-metre Sky Survey. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 622. A15–A15. 21 indexed citations
13.
Jarvis, Mike. (2015). TreeCorr: Two-point correlation functions. Astrophysics Source Code Library. 12 indexed citations
14.
Gruen, D., G. M. Bernstein, Mike Jarvis, et al.. (2015). Characterization and correction of charge-induced pixel shifts in DECam. Journal of Instrumentation. 10(5). C05032–C05032. 30 indexed citations
15.
Fine, S., et al.. (2015). Counting quasar–radio source pairs to derive the millijansky radio luminosity function and clustering strength toz = 3.5. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 452(3). 2692–2699. 2 indexed citations
16.
Jarvis, Mike. (2014). Challenges for precision shape measurements. Journal of Instrumentation. 9(3). C03017–C03017. 4 indexed citations
17.
Connolly, Andrew J., Bhuvnesh Jain, & Mike Jarvis. (2011). INTERPOLATING MASKED WEAK LENSING SIGNAL WITH KARHUNEN-LOEVE ANALYSIS. 9 indexed citations
18.
Jarvis, Mike, Masahiro Takada, Bhuvnesh Jain, & G. M. Bernstein. (2004). Weak Lensing Cosmology with LSST: Three-Point Shear Correlations. AAS. 205. 1 indexed citations
19.
Bernstein, G. M., et al.. (2001). Weak‐Lensing Determination of the Mass in Galaxy Halos. The Astrophysical Journal. 551(2). 643–650. 40 indexed citations
20.
Jarvis, Mike & Jim Thomson. (1977). Worst-Case Suppressor Testing Methods-The Minimum Attenuation Concept. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility. EMC-19(2). 99–100. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026