R. C. Barker

1.2k total citations
64 papers, 952 citations indexed

About

R. C. Barker is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials. According to data from OpenAlex, R. C. Barker has authored 64 papers receiving a total of 952 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 39 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 39 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering and 18 papers in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials. Recurrent topics in R. C. Barker's work include Semiconductor materials and devices (21 papers), Magnetic Properties and Applications (16 papers) and Magnetic properties of thin films (13 papers). R. C. Barker is often cited by papers focused on Semiconductor materials and devices (21 papers), Magnetic Properties and Applications (16 papers) and Magnetic properties of thin films (13 papers). R. C. Barker collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Japan. R. C. Barker's co-authors include A. Yelon, T.P. Ma, S. Mroczkowski, C. Vittoria, L. J. Guido, T. S. Moise, P. V. Dressendorfer, Armand R. Tanguay, M. C. Bashaw and T. Kobayashi and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical review. B, Condensed matter and Applied Physics Letters.

In The Last Decade

R. C. Barker

62 papers receiving 912 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
R. C. Barker United States 21 584 565 219 203 126 64 952
T.C. Arnoldussen United States 18 480 0.8× 381 0.7× 231 1.1× 267 1.3× 147 1.2× 42 864
Shao-hua Pan China 16 486 0.8× 365 0.6× 296 1.4× 86 0.4× 109 0.9× 55 824
M. A. McCord United States 20 646 1.1× 712 1.3× 169 0.8× 66 0.3× 80 0.6× 78 1.3k
Ganesh Sundaram United States 15 846 1.4× 610 1.1× 631 2.9× 132 0.7× 262 2.1× 52 1.5k
L.-E. Swartz United States 15 1.1k 1.8× 665 1.2× 330 1.5× 51 0.3× 169 1.3× 30 1.4k
Don W. Shaw United States 20 751 1.3× 980 1.7× 238 1.1× 32 0.2× 164 1.3× 42 1.2k
Rüdiger Weis United States 6 1.1k 1.9× 1.0k 1.8× 447 2.0× 166 0.8× 23 0.2× 26 1.5k
A. C. H. Rowe France 18 603 1.0× 588 1.0× 370 1.7× 63 0.3× 132 1.0× 57 1.1k
K. F. Huang Taiwan 20 946 1.6× 687 1.2× 149 0.7× 84 0.4× 35 0.3× 105 1.2k
G.N. Maracas United States 19 705 1.2× 830 1.5× 178 0.8× 47 0.2× 184 1.5× 87 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by R. C. Barker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. C. Barker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. C. Barker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. C. Barker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. C. Barker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. C. Barker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. C. Barker. The network helps show where R. C. Barker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. C. Barker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. C. Barker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. C. Barker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. C. Barker. R. C. Barker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ma, Tso‐Ping, et al.. (1998). Tunneling spectroscopy of the silicon metal-oxide-semiconductor system. 261–265. 3 indexed citations
2.
Barker, R. C., et al.. (1997). Doped rare-earth perovskite Mn films with colossal magnetoresistance. Applied Physics Letters. 71(23). 3418–3420. 19 indexed citations
3.
Cartwright, Alexander N., Thomas F. Boggess, Arthur L. Smirl, et al.. (1993). Magnitude, origin, and evolution of piezoelectric optical nonlinearities in strained [111]B InGaAs/GaAs quantum wells. Journal of Applied Physics. 73(11). 7767–7774. 46 indexed citations
4.
Moise, T. S., L. J. Guido, & R. C. Barker. (1993). Magnitude of the piezoelectric field in (111)B InyGa1−yAs strained-layer quantum wells. Journal of Applied Physics. 74(7). 4681–4684. 12 indexed citations
5.
Cunningham, Thomas J., et al.. (1992). Annealed indium oxide transparent ohmic contacts to GaAs. Journal of Applied Physics. 71(2). 1070–1072. 12 indexed citations
6.
Wang, Yu, et al.. (1990). Early stages of interface-trap transformation in metal-SiO2-(100)Si structures. Journal of Applied Physics. 68(5). 2520–2522. 2 indexed citations
7.
Bashaw, M. C., et al.. (1990). Theory of complementary holograms arising from electron–hole transport in photorefractive media. Journal of the Optical Society of America B. 7(12). 2329–2329. 27 indexed citations
8.
Bashaw, M. C., et al.. (1990). Introduction, revelation, and evolution of complementary gratings in photorefractive bismuth silicon oxide. Physical review. B, Condensed matter. 42(9). 5641–5648. 29 indexed citations
9.
Just, Dieter, et al.. (1989). The Photorefractive Effect In Doped Bismuth Silicon Oxide Crystals. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 1127. 195–195. 2 indexed citations
10.
Wang, Yu, et al.. (1988). Radiation and hot-electron effects on SiO2/Si interfaces with oxides grown in O2 containing small amounts of trichloroethane. Applied Physics Letters. 52(7). 573–575. 31 indexed citations
11.
Chen, Tze-Chiang, et al.. (1984). <title>Properties And Applications Of Infrared Transparent And Electrically Conductive In2O3 Thin Film</title>. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 430. 270–273. 3 indexed citations
12.
Dressendorfer, P. V., et al.. (1980). Processing dependence of metal/tunnel-oxide/silicon junctions. Applied Physics Letters. 36(10). 850–852. 10 indexed citations
13.
Heinrich, B., et al.. (1976). Transmission Resonance Experiments with Nickel and Permalloy Platelets. AIP conference proceedings. 250–252. 3 indexed citations
14.
Barker, R. C., et al.. (1974). Effect of gamma-ray irradiation on the surface states of MOS tunnel junctions. Journal of Applied Physics. 45(1). 317–321. 22 indexed citations
15.
Vittoria, C., R. C. Barker, & A. Yelon. (1971). Calculation of Standing Spin-Wave Resonance Modes in Ferromagnetic Metal Films. Journal of Applied Physics. 42(4). 1734–1736. 5 indexed citations
16.
Vittoria, C., R. C. Barker, & A. Yelon. (1967). Anisotropic Ferromagnetic Resonance Linewidth in Ni Platelets. Physical Review Letters. 19(14). 792–794. 36 indexed citations
17.
Barker, R. C., et al.. (1966). Bit-Plane Encoding: A Technique for Source Encoding. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems. AES-2(4). 385–392. 47 indexed citations
18.
Miller, James C. & R. C. Barker. (1963). Switching Properties of a Single-Crystal Specimen of Nickel Ferrite. Journal of Applied Physics. 34(4). 1129–1130. 5 indexed citations
19.
Barker, R. C., et al.. (1961). Detailed measurements of slow magnetization processes in tape-wound cores. Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers Part I Communication and Electronics. 80(4). 402–412. 2 indexed citations
20.
Barker, R. C., et al.. (1961). Measurements of the Domain Wall Area-Mobility Product during Slow Flux Reversals. Journal of Applied Physics. 32(3). S284–S285. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026