Poppy Brown

854 total citations · 1 hit paper
18 papers, 537 citations indexed

About

Poppy Brown is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Poppy Brown has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 537 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 6 papers in Clinical Psychology and 6 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Poppy Brown's work include Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (8 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (6 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (4 papers). Poppy Brown is often cited by papers focused on Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (8 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (6 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (4 papers). Poppy Brown collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Spain and United States. Poppy Brown's co-authors include Daniel Freeman, Felicity Waite, Alecia Nickless, Mel Slater, Megan Denne, Bernhard Spanlang, Jason Freeman, Sameer Kishore, Laina Rosebrock and Jessica C. Bird and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Scientific Reports and Clinical Psychology Review.

In The Last Decade

Poppy Brown

15 papers receiving 519 citations

Hit Papers

Automated psychological therapy using immersive virtual r... 2018 2026 2020 2023 2018 50 100 150 200

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Poppy Brown United Kingdom 9 171 161 147 124 110 18 537
Chris Geraets Netherlands 13 195 1.1× 158 1.0× 149 1.0× 183 1.5× 168 1.5× 24 616
Roos Pot-Kolder Netherlands 14 285 1.7× 184 1.1× 164 1.1× 188 1.5× 149 1.4× 22 701
Joan Ribas‐Sabaté Spain 11 155 0.9× 68 0.4× 257 1.7× 118 1.0× 91 0.8× 18 504
Jonathan Bradley United Kingdom 14 280 1.6× 236 1.5× 177 1.2× 51 0.4× 65 0.6× 27 678
Simon Riches United Kingdom 15 147 0.9× 95 0.6× 262 1.8× 212 1.7× 161 1.5× 61 764
Alexis Bourla France 12 72 0.4× 155 1.0× 160 1.1× 61 0.5× 205 1.9× 28 575
Emily J. Ginger United States 6 142 0.8× 81 0.5× 147 1.0× 60 0.5× 51 0.5× 8 521
María Vicenta Navarro Haro Spain 9 62 0.4× 92 0.6× 359 2.4× 124 1.0× 103 0.9× 26 554
Elisabeth C. D. van der Stouwe Netherlands 8 148 0.9× 72 0.4× 144 1.0× 47 0.4× 34 0.3× 20 336
Jamie R. Pogue United States 5 65 0.4× 200 1.2× 236 1.6× 182 1.5× 156 1.4× 8 625

Countries citing papers authored by Poppy Brown

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Poppy Brown's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Poppy Brown with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Poppy Brown more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Poppy Brown

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Poppy Brown. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Poppy Brown. The network helps show where Poppy Brown may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Poppy Brown

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Poppy Brown. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Poppy Brown based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Poppy Brown. Poppy Brown is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Brown, Poppy, et al.. (2025). Paranoia and unusual sensory experiences in Parkinson’s disease. Aging & Mental Health. 29(5). 935–950. 1 indexed citations
2.
Kabir, Thomas, Maurice Arbuthnott, Sarah Nettleton, et al.. (2024). Potential research priorities for understanding and treating severe paranoia (persecutory delusions): a priority-setting partnership between patients, carers, mental health staff, and researchers. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 27(1). e301224–e301224.
3.
Brown, Poppy, et al.. (2023). Worry intervention in an older adult with a persecutory delusion: A single case experimental design. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5(3). e11173–e11173. 2 indexed citations
5.
Brown, Poppy, Felicity Waite, Michael Larkin, et al.. (2022). It seems impossible that it’s been made so quickly ”: a qualitative investigation of concerns about the speed of COVID-19 vaccine development and how these may be overcome. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics. 18(1). 2004808–2004808. 13 indexed citations
7.
Brown, Poppy, et al.. (2021). A compassionate imagery intervention for patients with persecutory delusions. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy. 50(1). 15–27. 17 indexed citations
8.
Brown, Poppy, Felicity Waite, & Daniel Freeman. (2020). Parenting behaviour and paranoia: a network analysis and results from the National Comorbidity Survey-Adolescents (NCS-A). Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 56(4). 593–604. 5 indexed citations
9.
Brown, Poppy, Felicity Waite, Aitor Rovira, Alecia Nickless, & Daniel Freeman. (2020). Virtual reality clinical-experimental tests of compassion treatment techniques to reduce paranoia. Scientific Reports. 10(1). 8547–8547. 30 indexed citations
10.
Brown, Poppy. (2020). Research into student mental health: where have we come and how can we improve?. Journal of Public Mental Health. 19(1). 9–12. 1 indexed citations
11.
Brown, Poppy, Felicity Waite, Sinéad Lambe, Laina Rosebrock, & Daniel Freeman. (2020). Virtual Reality Cognitive Therapy in Inpatient Psychiatric Wards: Protocol for a Qualitative Investigation of Staff and Patient Views Across Multiple National Health Service Sites. JMIR Research Protocols. 9(8). e20300–e20300. 9 indexed citations
12.
Brown, Poppy, Felicity Waite, Aitor Rovira, & Daniel Freeman. (2020). Power posing for paranoia: A double-blind randomised controlled experimental test using virtual reality. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 132. 103691–103691. 1 indexed citations
13.
Brown, Poppy, et al.. (2020). T100. BELIEFS ABOUT THE SELF AND OTHERS IN PARANOIA. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 46(Supplement_1). S269–S269. 1 indexed citations
14.
Freeman, Daniel, Bao Sheng Loe, David Kingdon, et al.. (2019). The revised Green et al., Paranoid Thoughts Scale (R-GPTS): psychometric properties, severity ranges, and clinical cut-offs. Psychological Medicine. 51(2). 244–253. 167 indexed citations
15.
Freeman, Daniel, Jason Freeman, Bernhard Spanlang, et al.. (2018). Automated psychological therapy using immersive virtual reality for treatment of fear of heights: a single-blind, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Psychiatry. 5(8). 625–632. 244 indexed citations breakdown →
16.
Brown, Poppy, Felicity Waite, & Daniel Freeman. (2018). ‘Twisting the lion's tail’: Manipulationist tests of causation for psychological mechanisms in the occurrence of delusions and hallucinations. Clinical Psychology Review. 68. 25–37. 13 indexed citations
17.
Vallejos, Elvira Pérez, et al.. (2016). Kundalini yoga as mutual recovery: a feasibility study including children in care and their carers. Journal of Children s Services. 11(4). 261–282. 11 indexed citations
18.
Brown, B. R. & Poppy Brown. (1963). Rearrangement during reduction of -and -2-phenylcinnamic acids with lithium aluminium hydride. Tetrahedron Letters. 4(4). 191–192.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026