Jessica C. Bird
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- Daniel FreemanFelicity WaiteBao Sheng LoeAndrew MolodynskiHelen StartupPoppy BrownDavid KingdonBryony Sheaves
- Topics
- Schizophrenia research and treatment (14 papers)Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (10 papers)Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Jessica C. Bird
23 papers receiving 443 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Psychiatry and Mental health 255
- Clinical Psychology 199
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 178
- Cognitive Neuroscience 84
- Social Psychology 77
Countries citing papers authored by Jessica C. Bird
This map shows the geographic impact of Jessica C. Bird's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jessica C. Bird with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jessica C. Bird more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jessica C. Bird
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jessica C. Bird. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jessica C. Bird. The network helps show where Jessica C. Bird may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jessica C. Bird
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jessica C. Bird. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jessica C. Bird based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jessica C. Bird. Jessica C. Bird is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 167 | |
| 14 | 23 | |
| 15 | 43 | |
| 16 | 12 | |
| 17 | 21 | |
| 18 | 38 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 40 |
About Jessica C. Bird
Jessica C. Bird is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 449 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (14 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (10 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (255 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (178 citations) and Clinical Psychology (199 citations). Jessica C. Bird has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Freeman, Felicity Waite, Bao Sheng Loe, Andrew Molodynski, Helen Startup, Poppy Brown, David Kingdon, Bryony Sheaves, Laina Rosebrock and Eleanor Chadwick. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Medicine, Behaviour Research and Therapy and Schizophrenia Bulletin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.