Maurice Arbuthnott
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Epidemiology
- Co-authors
- Helen KillaspyMichael KingGerard LeaveyIsobel HarrisonPaul McCroneStefan PriebeJoanna KrotofilPeter McPherson
- Topics
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement (10 papers)Psychiatric care and mental health services (8 papers)Schizophrenia research and treatment (6 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaThe British Journal of PsychiatryBMC Health Services Research
- Partner nations
- United KingdomItalyIreland
In The Last Decade
Maurice Arbuthnott
14 papers receiving 294 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
- General Health Professions 215
- Clinical Psychology 122
- Psychiatry and Mental health 91
- Social Psychology 54
- Epidemiology 29
Countries citing papers authored by Maurice Arbuthnott
This map shows the geographic impact of Maurice Arbuthnott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maurice Arbuthnott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maurice Arbuthnott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Maurice Arbuthnott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maurice Arbuthnott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maurice Arbuthnott. The network helps show where Maurice Arbuthnott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Maurice Arbuthnott
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Maurice Arbuthnott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Maurice Arbuthnott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Maurice Arbuthnott. Maurice Arbuthnott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 29 | |
| 5 | 20 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 22 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 34 | |
| 11 | 57 | |
| 12 | 28 | |
| 13 | 24 | |
| 14 | 38 | |
| 15 | 17 | |
| 16 | 1 |
About Maurice Arbuthnott
Maurice Arbuthnott is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 16 papers that have together received 299 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Patient Involvement (10 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (8 papers) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (215 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (91 citations) and Clinical Psychology (122 citations). Maurice Arbuthnott has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Helen Killaspy, Michael King, Gerard Leavey, Isobel Harrison, Paul McCrone, Stefan Priebe, Joanna Krotofil, Peter McPherson, Sarah Curtis and Geoff Shepherd. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The British Journal of Psychiatry and BMC Health Services Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.