Ping Ren

876 citations
47 papers · 560 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Ping Ren

41 papers receiving 539 citations

Peers

Ping Ren
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Clinical Psychology 180
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 92
  • Social Psychology 142
  • Applied Psychology 29
  • Education 149
Replace Sarwat Sultan with:
Sarwat Sultan Pakistan
Shanyan Lin Italy
Peter Leeson Australia
Mary Louise Arnold Canada
Yaşar Kuzucu Türkiye
Uğur Doğan Türkiye
Quanlei Yu China
Fangfang Wen China
Matthias Donat Germany
Justin W. Vollet United States
Ping Ren relative to Sarwat Sultan Pakistan Sarwat Sultan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
Sarwat Sultan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ping Ren

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ping Ren's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ping Ren with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ping Ren more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ping Ren

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ping Ren. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ping Ren. The network helps show where Ping Ren may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ping Ren, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ping Ren Line = papers co-authored together Ping Ren links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201896
2 202186
3 202153
4 200433
5 201829
6 202119
7 202318
8 202217
9 202316
10 202316
11 202313
12 202013
13 202313
14 202212
15 202310
16 20239
17 20229
18 20229
19 20229
20 20229

About Ping Ren

Ping Ren is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Education, Sociology and Political Science and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 47 papers that have together received 560 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (17 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (16 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (5 papers), Parental Involvement in Education (5 papers), Youth Development and Social Support (5 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (4 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (4 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (180 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (92 citations), Social Psychology (142 citations), Applied Psychology (29 citations) and Education (149 citations). Ping Ren has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Yunyun Zhang, Quanquan Wang, Ming Ming Chiu, Shiqi Li, Hao Lei, Jiahui Chen, Lifang Deng, Feng Wang, Fang Luo and Yue Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Youth and Adolescence, Journal of Affective Disorders, Journal of Adolescence, European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry and Journal of Interpersonal Violence.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact