Phyllis Illari

24 papers receiving 828 citations

Peers

Phyllis Illari
Comparison fields: 5 of 142
  • History and Philosophy of Science 373
  • Family Practice 28
  • General Decision Sciences 17
  • Philosophy 102
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 63
Replace Donald Gillies with:
Donald Gillies United Kingdom
Jan Sprenger Netherlands
Julian Reiss United Kingdom
Lorenz Krüger Germany
Darrell P. Rowbottom United Kingdom
Bennett Holman South Korea
Marc R. Forster United States
Luc Bovens United Kingdom
Zeno G. Swijtink United States
Felipe Romero Netherlands
Phyllis Illari relative to Donald Gillies United Kingdom Donald Gillies's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Donald Gillies · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Phyllis Illari

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phyllis Illari's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phyllis Illari with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phyllis Illari more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phyllis Illari

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phyllis Illari. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phyllis Illari. The network helps show where Phyllis Illari may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Phyllis Illari, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Phyllis Illari Line = papers co-authored together Phyllis Illari links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 202116
3 20192
4 20188
5 201832
6 20184
7 201723
8 20172
9
Routledge Handbook of mechanisms
20173
10 20161
11 20140
12 201311
13 2013132
14 201343
15 201316
16 201266
17 201131
18 201181
19 2011260
20 201032

About Phyllis Illari

Phyllis Illari is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, having authored 26 papers that have together received 885 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (13 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (4 papers), Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (3 papers), Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (2 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (2 papers), Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (2 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (2 papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (373 citations), Family Practice (28 citations), General Decision Sciences (17 citations), Philosophy (102 citations) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (63 citations). Phyllis Illari has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Jon Williamson, Federica Russo, Brendan Clarke, Donald Gillies, Luciano Floridi, Beth Shaw, Stuart Glennan, Paolo Vineis, Michael P. Kelly and Erik Weber. Their work appears in journals such as Journal for General Philosophy of Science, Topoi, Philosophy & Technology, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences and Emerging Themes in Epidemiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026