This map shows the geographic impact of Erik Weber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erik Weber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erik Weber more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erik Weber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erik Weber. The network helps show where Erik Weber may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Erik Weber
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Erik Weber.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Erik Weber based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Erik Weber. Erik Weber is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Leuridan, B & Erik Weber. (2012). Causality and Explanation in the Sciences. THEORIA An International Journal for Theory History and Foundations of Science. 27(2). 133–136.1 indexed citations
6.
Weber, Erik, et al.. (2010). Metaphysical Explanatory Asymmetries. Logique et analyse/Logique et analyse. Nouvelle série. 53(211). 345–365.3 indexed citations
7.
Weber, Erik & Leen De Vreese. (2009). Conceptual analysis of causation and theoretical utility in everyday contexts. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).1 indexed citations
8.
Vreese, Leen De & Erik Weber. (2008). Confusion and bad arguments in the conceptual analysis of causation. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).3 indexed citations
9.
Weber, Erik & B Leuridan. (2008). Counterfactuals and causal inference: methods and principles for social research. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).1 indexed citations
10.
Weber, Erik, et al.. (2005). The Functions of Intentional Explanations of Actions. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University). 33(1). 1–16.6 indexed citations
Weber, Erik, et al.. (2002). Explanatory Proofs in Mathematics. Logique et analyse/Logique et analyse. Nouvelle série. 299–307.13 indexed citations
13.
Weber, Erik, et al.. (2001). Adaptive Logic and Covering Law Explanations. Logique et analyse/Logique et analyse. Nouvelle série. 237–254.
14.
Bouwel, Jeroen Van & Erik Weber. (2000). Can we dispense with the structural explanation of social facts?. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).8 indexed citations
15.
Weber, Erik, et al.. (1999). A Formal Analysis of Diagnosis and Diagnostic Reasoning.. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).2 indexed citations
16.
Weber, Erik. (1998). The practical functions and epistemology of causal beliefs. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).1 indexed citations
17.
Weber, Erik. (1998). Prudential Arguments in the Realism Debate.. Logique et analyse/Logique et analyse. Nouvelle série. 164. 301–312.1 indexed citations
18.
Weber, Erik. (1995). Some problems for Kitcher's unification account of explanation. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University). 28. 441–456.2 indexed citations
Weber, Erik. (1990). Phenomenological Laws and their Application to Scientific Epistemic Explanation Problems. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.