Julian Reiss
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Philosophy top 2%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Co-authors
- Roman FriggPhilip KitcherLinsey McGoeyAyo WahlbergRachel A. AnkenyBruce CaldwellBoyko GueorguievCarsten Neumann
- Topics
- Philosophy and History of Science (28 papers)Economic Theory and Institutions (15 papers)Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (6 papers)
- Journals
- PLoS ONEInjuryPhilosophy of Science
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNetherlandsSpain
In The Last Decade
Julian Reiss
59 papers receiving 932 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
- History and Philosophy of Science 341
- Economics and Econometrics 333
- Sociology and Political Science 238
- Philosophy 121
- Political Science and International Relations 85
Countries citing papers authored by Julian Reiss
This map shows the geographic impact of Julian Reiss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julian Reiss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julian Reiss more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Julian Reiss
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julian Reiss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julian Reiss. The network helps show where Julian Reiss may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julian Reiss
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julian Reiss. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julian Reiss based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julian Reiss. Julian Reiss is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | Philosophy of Science in Practice: Nancy Cartwright and the nature of scientific reasoning. | 13 |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 42 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 21 | |
| 9 | 23 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | Error in economics: the methodology of evidence-based economics | 13 |
| 14 | 42 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 86 | |
| 17 | Error in Economics: Towards a More Evidence–Based Methodology | 80 |
| 18 | Review of Kevin Hoover's Methodology of Empirical Macroeconomics | 1 |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Julian Reiss
Julian Reiss is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, General Decision Sciences and General Psychology, having authored 61 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (28 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (15 papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (341 citations), General Decision Sciences (79 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (333 citations). Julian Reiss has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Roman Frigg, Philip Kitcher, Linsey McGoey, Ayo Wahlberg, Rachel A. Ankeny, Bruce Caldwell, Boyko Gueorguiev, Carsten Neumann, Florian Baumann and Markus Loibl. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Injury and Philosophy of Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.