Beth Shaw
Impact in
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 5%
- Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
- Family Practice top 5%
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews 3
- Co-authors
- Ruaraidh Hill (3 shared papers)Tim Stokes (3 shared papers)Nefyn Williams (1 shared paper)Lauren Walker (1 shared paper)Janet Reed (1 shared paper)Alison Jayne Doherty (1 shared paper)Andrew Clegg (1 shared paper)Paul Boland (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- BMJ evidence-based medicine (3 papers)The Lancet Infectious Diseases (2 papers)Annals of Internal Medicine (1 paper)Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (1 paper)Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Beth Shaw
18 papers receiving 668 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 107
- Family Practice 46
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 18
- Infectious Diseases 149
- Medical Terminology 2
Countries citing papers authored by Beth Shaw
This map shows the geographic impact of Beth Shaw's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beth Shaw with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beth Shaw more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Beth Shaw
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beth Shaw. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beth Shaw. The network helps show where Beth Shaw may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Beth Shaw, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 135 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 124 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 64 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 54 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 48 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 48 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 46 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 45 | |
| 9 | 2023 | 39 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 32 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 18 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 13 | 2008 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2025 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2025 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 18 | Beth Shaw's Yogafit | 2000 | 1 |
| 19 | 1994 | 0 |
About Beth Shaw
Beth Shaw is a scholar working on Family Practice, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Toxicology, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 19 papers that have together received 682 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (3 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (3 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (2 papers), Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (2 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers) and Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (107 citations), Family Practice (46 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (18 citations), Infectious Diseases (149 citations) and Medical Terminology (2 citations). Beth Shaw has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Ruaraidh Hill, Tim Stokes, Nefyn Williams, Lauren Walker, Janet Reed, Alison Jayne Doherty, Andrew Clegg, Paul Boland, Benjamin J Visser and Martin P. Grobusch. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ evidence-based medicine, The Lancet Infectious Diseases, Annals of Internal Medicine, Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research and Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.