Phillip D. Whitfield
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Physiology top 2%
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 5%
- Cell Biology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Mary K. DohertyPeter J. MeiklePeter T. ClaytonIan L. MegsonBenjamin H. MaskreyKishore IyerAdriano G. RossiJohn J. Hopwood
- Topics
- Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research (13 papers)Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (12 papers)Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (8 papers)
- Journals
- Nature CommunicationsSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaBlood
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Phillip D. Whitfield
71 papers receiving 2.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
- Molecular Biology 913
- Physiology 840
- Epidemiology 349
- Nutrition and Dietetics 298
- Cell Biology 267
Countries citing papers authored by Phillip D. Whitfield
This map shows the geographic impact of Phillip D. Whitfield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phillip D. Whitfield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phillip D. Whitfield more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Phillip D. Whitfield
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phillip D. Whitfield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phillip D. Whitfield. The network helps show where Phillip D. Whitfield may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Phillip D. Whitfield
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Phillip D. Whitfield. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Phillip D. Whitfield based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Phillip D. Whitfield. Phillip D. Whitfield is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 40 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 23 | |
| 11 | 21 | |
| 12 | 15 | |
| 13 | 21 | |
| 14 | 20 | |
| 15 | 40 | |
| 16 | 43 | |
| 17 | 41 | |
| 18 | 17 | |
| 19 | 167 | |
| 20 | 43 |
About Phillip D. Whitfield
Phillip D. Whitfield is a scholar working on Aging, Aquatic Science and Physiology, having authored 73 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research (13 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (12 papers) and Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (840 citations), Biological Psychiatry (62 citations) and Clinical Biochemistry (142 citations). Phillip D. Whitfield has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Mary K. Doherty, Peter J. Meikle, Peter T. Clayton, Ian L. Megson, Benjamin H. Maskrey, Kishore Iyer, Adriano G. Rossi, John J. Hopwood, Alexander J. German and Peter‐John M. Noble. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Blood.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.