Philipp Lirk

8.3k total citations · 4 hit papers
143 papers, 5.2k citations indexed

About

Philipp Lirk is a scholar working on Surgery, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Physiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Philipp Lirk has authored 143 papers receiving a total of 5.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 85 papers in Surgery, 39 papers in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and 30 papers in Physiology. Recurrent topics in Philipp Lirk's work include Anesthesia and Pain Management (74 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (25 papers) and Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (23 papers). Philipp Lirk is often cited by papers focused on Anesthesia and Pain Management (74 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (25 papers) and Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (23 papers). Philipp Lirk collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Austria. Philipp Lirk's co-authors include Markus W. Hollmann, Josef Rieder, Matthias Lechner, Markus F. Stevens, Brian Jenkins, Robin A Seymour, Jeroen Hermanides, C. Keller, Quinn H. Hogan and F. Bodrogi and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, The Journal of Physiology and Annals of Surgery.

In The Last Decade

Philipp Lirk

138 papers receiving 5.0k citations

Hit Papers

The Efficacy of Preemptive Analgesia for Acute Postoperat... 2005 2026 2012 2019 2005 2019 2021 2022 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Philipp Lirk United States 39 2.9k 1.3k 875 691 668 143 5.2k
Guy Weinberg United States 44 3.6k 1.2× 1.6k 1.2× 746 0.9× 891 1.3× 710 1.1× 126 6.8k
Akiyoshi Namiki Japan 34 1.5k 0.5× 1.4k 1.1× 1.3k 1.4× 901 1.3× 425 0.6× 296 4.6k
Michael G. Irwin Hong Kong 52 2.7k 0.9× 2.6k 2.1× 812 0.9× 1.7k 2.5× 1.4k 2.0× 294 7.9k
Michiaki Yamakage Japan 30 1.4k 0.5× 1.2k 0.9× 696 0.8× 642 0.9× 420 0.6× 317 3.7k
Atsuhiro Sakamoto Japan 35 1.1k 0.4× 1.4k 1.1× 723 0.8× 864 1.3× 308 0.5× 193 4.5k
Shuji Dohi Japan 34 1.8k 0.6× 1.2k 0.9× 695 0.8× 908 1.3× 363 0.5× 230 3.9k
John F. Butterworth United States 34 2.4k 0.8× 864 0.7× 402 0.5× 1.3k 1.9× 461 0.7× 149 4.9k
Markus Steinfath Germany 40 1.9k 0.7× 1.1k 0.9× 527 0.6× 1.8k 2.6× 231 0.3× 189 4.7k
Dennis M. Fisher United States 42 2.1k 0.7× 3.0k 2.3× 562 0.6× 794 1.1× 154 0.2× 141 5.7k
Shung‐Tai Ho Taiwan 34 2.2k 0.7× 1.2k 1.0× 744 0.9× 445 0.6× 392 0.6× 183 4.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Philipp Lirk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philipp Lirk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philipp Lirk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philipp Lirk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philipp Lirk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philipp Lirk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philipp Lirk. The network helps show where Philipp Lirk may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philipp Lirk

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philipp Lirk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philipp Lirk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philipp Lirk. Philipp Lirk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
4.
Stone, Alexander B., Philipp Lirk, & Kamen Vlassakov. (2022). Rebound Pain After Peripheral Nerve Blockade—Bad Timing or Rude Awakening?. Anesthesiology Clinics. 40(3). 445–454. 12 indexed citations
5.
Keudell, Arvind von, Girish P. Joshi, Kamen Vlassakov, et al.. (2021). Procedure-specific acute pain trajectory after elective total hip arthroplasty: systematic review and data synthesis. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 127(1). 110–132. 34 indexed citations
6.
Lemoine, Adrien, Hélène Beloeil, Françis Bonnet, et al.. (2021). PROSPECT guidelines update for evidence-based pain management after prostatectomy for cancer. Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine. 40(4). 100922–100922. 13 indexed citations
7.
Anger, Michael S., Hélène Beloeil, Philipp Lirk, et al.. (2021). PROSPECT guideline for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and procedure‐specific postoperative pain management recommendations. Anaesthesia. 76(8). 1082–1097. 144 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
Ridderikhof, Milan L., et al.. (2019). The relationship between patient factors and the refusal of analgesics in adult Emergency Department patients with extremity injuries, a case-control study. Scandinavian Journal of Pain. 20(1). 87–94. 1 indexed citations
9.
Živković, Nenad, Henning Hermanns, Philipp Lirk, et al.. (2019). Face and construct validity of TU-Delft epidural simulator and the value of real-time visualization. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine. 44(3). 298–302. 4 indexed citations
10.
Lirk, Philipp, et al.. (2019). Pain management after laparoscopic hysterectomy: systematic review of literature and PROSPECT recommendations. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine. 44(4). 425–436. 58 indexed citations
11.
Barazanchi, Ahmed, Wiremu MacFater, Andrew Hill, et al.. (2018). Evidence-based management of pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a PROSPECT review update. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 121(4). 787–803. 123 indexed citations
12.
Hollmann, Markus W., et al.. (2016). Local Anesthetic-Induced Neurotoxicity. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 17(3). 339–339. 146 indexed citations
13.
Mungroop, Timothy H., Denise P. Veelo, Olivier R. Busch, et al.. (2016). Continuous wound infiltration versus epidural analgesia after hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery (POP-UP): a randomised controlled, open-label, non-inferiority trial. ˜The œLancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology. 1(2). 105–113. 42 indexed citations
14.
Sammour, Tarik, Ahmed Barazanchi, Andrew Hill, et al.. (2016). Evidence‐Based Management of Pain After Excisional Haemorrhoidectomy Surgery: A PROSPECT Review Update. World Journal of Surgery. 41(2). 603–614. 65 indexed citations
15.
Lirk, Philipp, et al.. (2015). Adjuvanzien in der modernen Anästhesie – Lidocain. AINS - Anästhesiologie · Intensivmedizin · Notfallmedizin · Schmerztherapie. 50(5). 322–327. 1 indexed citations
16.
Lirk, Philipp, et al.. (2015). Adjuvanzien in der modernen Anästhesie – Magnesium. AINS - Anästhesiologie · Intensivmedizin · Notfallmedizin · Schmerztherapie. 50(6). 380–387. 1 indexed citations
17.
Loon, Anouk M. van, H. Steven Scholte, Johannes J. Fahrenfort, et al.. (2013). Ketamine changes the neural representation of object recognition in early visual cortex.. Journal of Vision. 13(9). 129–129. 1 indexed citations
18.
Rigaud, Marcel, et al.. (2008). Guidance of Block Needle Insertion by Electrical Nerve Stimulation. Anesthesiology. 109(3). 473–478. 35 indexed citations
19.
Fridrich, Peter, Ajay D. Wasan, Philipp Lirk, et al.. (2007). Phase 1A Safety Assessment of Intravenous Amitriptyline. Journal of Pain. 8(7). 549–555. 12 indexed citations
20.
Lirk, Philipp, et al.. (2005). The Efficacy of Preemptive Analgesia for Acute Postoperative Pain Management: A Meta-Analysis. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 100(3). 757–773. 476 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026