Thomas M. van Gulik

34.2k total citations · 2 hit papers
611 papers, 23.4k citations indexed

About

Thomas M. van Gulik is a scholar working on Surgery, Hepatology and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas M. van Gulik has authored 611 papers receiving a total of 23.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 421 papers in Surgery, 236 papers in Hepatology and 206 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Thomas M. van Gulik's work include Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies (157 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (154 papers) and Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (139 papers). Thomas M. van Gulik is often cited by papers focused on Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies (157 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (154 papers) and Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (139 papers). Thomas M. van Gulik collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Germany. Thomas M. van Gulik's co-authors include Olivier R. Busch, Dirk J. Gouma, Dirk J. Gouma, Michal Heger, Wilmar de Graaf, Roelof J. Bennink, H. Obertop, L T de Wit, Marc G. Besselink and S. M. M. de Castro and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Nature Communications and Journal of Clinical Oncology.

In The Last Decade

Thomas M. van Gulik

596 papers receiving 22.9k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories sort by overperformance

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Rates of Complications and Death After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Risk Factors and the Impact of Hospital Volume

2000 690 citations Dirk J. Gouma, Rutger C. I. van Geenen et al. profile →
Preoperative Biliary Drainage for Cancer of the Head of the Pancreas

2010 667 citations Niels A. van der Gaag, Erik A. Rauws et al. profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Thomas M. van Gulik Netherlands	80	15.0k	8.9k	8.3k	7.1k	4.9k	611	23.4k
Norihiro Kokudo Japan	80	12.5k 0.8×	7.3k 0.8×	5.8k 0.7×	16.4k 2.3×	7.2k 1.5×	727	26.0k
Mitsuo Shimada Japan	70	9.9k 0.7×	5.9k 0.7×	4.2k 0.5×	7.7k 1.1×	4.1k 0.8×	847	20.5k
Wolf O. Bechstein Germany	58	9.5k 0.6×	7.9k 0.9×	4.4k 0.5×	9.3k 1.3×	4.4k 0.9×	637	20.5k
Pierre–Alain Clavien Switzerland	92	18.3k 1.2×	5.6k 0.6×	3.4k 0.4×	13.1k 1.8×	6.4k 1.3×	480	28.0k
Daniel Azoulay France	72	10.0k 0.7×	8.2k 0.9×	3.9k 0.5×	13.5k 1.9×	4.9k 1.0×	443	20.4k
Gregory Y. Lauwers United States	88	13.6k 0.9×	11.2k 1.3×	7.2k 0.9×	5.2k 0.7×	6.1k 1.2×	448	28.5k
Steven M. Strasberg United States	67	12.1k 0.8×	7.7k 0.9×	6.9k 0.8×	5.9k 0.8×	2.6k 0.5×	297	18.9k
Wan Yee Lau China	65	8.0k 0.5×	5.4k 0.6×	4.3k 0.5×	10.8k 1.5×	5.7k 1.2×	440	19.1k
Jan N.M. IJzermans Netherlands	67	9.0k 0.6×	3.7k 0.4×	4.3k 0.5×	4.9k 0.7×	2.5k 0.5×	658	19.8k
Richard D. Schulick United States	86	17.3k 1.2×	19.7k 2.2×	10.6k 1.3×	4.6k 0.6×	6.1k 1.2×	347	32.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas M. van Gulik

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas M. van Gulik's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas M. van Gulik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas M. van Gulik more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas M. van Gulik

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas M. van Gulik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas M. van Gulik. The network helps show where Thomas M. van Gulik may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas M. van Gulik

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas M. van Gulik. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas M. van Gulik based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas M. van Gulik. Thomas M. van Gulik is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Buettner, Stefan, Marc G. Besselink, Olivier R. Busch, et al.. (2021). Surgical morbidity in the first year after resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. HPB. 23(10). 1607–1614. 11 indexed citations

Nooijen, Lynn E., Rutger‐Jan Swijnenburg, Heinz‐Josef Klümpen, et al.. (2021). Surgical Therapy for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: State of the Art. Visceral Medicine. 37(1). 18–25. 10 indexed citations

Klompenhouwer, Anne J., Martijn P. D. Haring, Maarten G.J. Thomeer, et al.. (2020). A multicentre retrospective analysis on growth of residual hepatocellular adenoma after resection. Liver International. 40(9). 2272–2278. 8 indexed citations

Olthof, Pim B., Luca Aldrighetti, Ruslan Alikhanov, et al.. (2020). Portal Vein Embolization is Associated with Reduced Liver Failure and Mortality in High-Risk Resections for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 27(7). 2311–2318. 43 indexed citations

Rodermond, Hans M., Jan Sijbrands, Jantien A. Vogel, et al.. (2020). HyCHEED System for Maintaining Stable Temperature Control during Preclinical Irreversible Electroporation Experiments at Clinically Relevant Temperature and Pulse Settings. Sensors. 20(21). 6227–6227. 3 indexed citations

Klompenhouwer, Anne J., Martijn P. D. Haring, Vincent E. de Meijer, et al.. (2019). Safety and efficacy of transarterial embolization of hepatocellular adenomas. British journal of surgery. 106(10). 1362–1371. 10 indexed citations

Vogel, Jantien A., Eran van Veldhuisen, Lindy K. Alles, et al.. (2019). Time-Dependent Impact of Irreversible Electroporation on Pathology and Ablation Size in the Porcine Liver: A 24-Hour Experimental Study. Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment. 18. 1078144547–1078144547. 18 indexed citations

Strijker, Marin, Lydia G. van der Geest, Thomas M. van Gulik, et al.. (2019). Treatment and survival of resected and unresected distal cholangiocarcinoma: a nationwide study. Acta Oncologica. 58(7). 1048–1055. 78 indexed citations

Rassam, Fadi, Kasia P. Cieslak, Cristina Lavini, et al.. (2019). Comparison between dynamic gadoxetate-enhanced MRI and 99mTc-mebrofenin hepatobiliary scintigraphy with SPECT for quantitative assessment of liver function. European Radiology. 29(9). 5063–5072. 23 indexed citations

10.

Rassam, Fadi, Pim B. Olthof, Krijn P. van Lienden, et al.. (2018). Functional and volumetric assessment of liver segments after portal vein embolization: Differences in hypertrophy response. Surgery. 165(4). 686–695. 22 indexed citations

11.

Roos, Eva, Lowiek M. Hubers, Robert J.S. Coelen, et al.. (2018). IgG4-Associated Cholangitis in Patients Resected for Presumed Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: a 30-Year Tertiary care Experience. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 113(5). 765–772. 40 indexed citations

12.

Vries, Reinier J. de, Peony D. Banik, Sonal Nagpal, et al.. (2018). Bulk Droplet Vitrification: An Approach to Improve Large-Scale Hepatocyte Cryopreservation Outcome. Langmuir. 35(23). 7354–7363. 34 indexed citations

13.

Hartog, Hermien, Jan N.M. IJzermans, Thomas M. van Gulik, & Bas Groot Koerkamp. (2016). Resection of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma. Surgical Clinics of North America. 96(2). 247–267. 19 indexed citations

14.

Mungroop, Timothy H., Denise P. Veelo, Olivier R. Busch, et al.. (2015). Continuous wound infiltration or epidural analgesia for pain prevention after hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery within an enhanced recovery program (POP-UP trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 16(1). 562–562. 7 indexed citations

15.

Reiniers, Megan J., Rowan F. van Golen, Thomas M. van Gulik, & Michal Heger. (2013). Reactive Oxygen and Nitrogen Species in Steatotic Hepatocytes: A Molecular Perspective on the Pathophysiology of Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in the Fatty Liver. Antioxidants and Redox Signaling. 21(7). 1119–1142. 98 indexed citations

16.

Bieze, Matthanja, Roelof J. Bennink, Saffire S.K.S. Phoa, et al.. (2012). The use of 18F-fluoromethylcholine PET/CT in differentiating focal nodular hyperplasia from hepatocellular adenoma. Nuclear Medicine Communications. 34(2). 146–154. 11 indexed citations

17.

Kloek, Jaap J., Niels A. van der Gaag, Deha Erdogan, et al.. (2011). A comparative study of intraductal papillary neoplasia of the biliary tract and pancreas. Human Pathology. 42(6). 824–832. 52 indexed citations

18.

Graaf, Wilmar de, Jacomina W. van den Esschert, Krijn P. van Lienden, & Thomas M. van Gulik. (2008). Induction of Tumor Growth After Preoperative Portal Vein Embolization: Is It a Real Problem?. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 16(2). 423–430. 107 indexed citations

19.

Geenen, Rutger C. I. van, F.J.W. ten Kate, L T de Wit, et al.. (2001). Segmental resection and wedge excision of the portal or superior mesenteric vein during pancreatoduodenectomy. Surgery. 129(2). 158–163. 102 indexed citations

20.

Gulik, Thomas M. van, et al.. (1986). Kimura's disease in the spermatic cord, an unusual site of a rare tumor.. PubMed. 38(3). 93–5. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact