Tom M. Karsten

5.0k total citations
35 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Tom M. Karsten is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Tom M. Karsten has authored 35 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in Surgery, 26 papers in Oncology and 13 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in Tom M. Karsten's work include Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (17 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (10 papers) and Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (8 papers). Tom M. Karsten is often cited by papers focused on Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (17 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (10 papers) and Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (8 papers). Tom M. Karsten collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and France. Tom M. Karsten's co-authors include Marc G. Besselink, Johan F. Lange, Rob A.�E.�M. Tollenaar, Olivier R. Busch, Niels Komen, Juliette Slieker, Ignace H. J. T. de Hingh, P. Willemsen, G. H. H. Mannaerts and Michel W.J.M. Wouters and has published in prestigious journals such as Annals of Surgery, Clinical Cancer Research and Annals of Oncology.

In The Last Decade

Tom M. Karsten

35 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Tom M. Karsten Netherlands 21 651 611 396 196 89 35 1.0k
Abhishek D. Parmar United States 17 608 0.9× 569 0.9× 408 1.0× 41 0.2× 70 0.8× 43 850
Ido Mizrahi Israel 18 204 0.3× 585 1.0× 250 0.6× 83 0.4× 185 2.1× 63 984
Timothy M. Geiger United States 16 355 0.5× 465 0.8× 166 0.4× 140 0.7× 13 0.1× 51 742
Peter Pockney Australia 14 294 0.5× 393 0.6× 65 0.2× 167 0.9× 52 0.6× 46 645
Irene Epelboym United States 17 429 0.7× 456 0.7× 222 0.6× 52 0.3× 32 0.4× 27 727
Sinziana Dumitra Canada 15 204 0.3× 327 0.5× 141 0.4× 54 0.3× 116 1.3× 36 553
S. Kriwanek Austria 16 324 0.5× 611 1.0× 263 0.7× 66 0.3× 12 0.1× 53 974
Hayato Kurihara Italy 13 216 0.3× 284 0.5× 350 0.9× 36 0.2× 42 0.5× 57 733
Ronald J. Place United States 17 278 0.4× 543 0.9× 118 0.3× 67 0.3× 35 0.4× 38 893

Countries citing papers authored by Tom M. Karsten

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom M. Karsten's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom M. Karsten with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom M. Karsten more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom M. Karsten

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom M. Karsten. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom M. Karsten. The network helps show where Tom M. Karsten may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tom M. Karsten

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tom M. Karsten. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tom M. Karsten based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tom M. Karsten. Tom M. Karsten is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
Groen, Jesse V., F. Jasmijn Smits, Marc G. Besselink, et al.. (2021). Completion pancreatectomy or a pancreas-preserving procedure during relaparotomy for pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy: a multicentre cohort study and meta-analysis. British journal of surgery. 108(11). 1371–1379. 17 indexed citations
3.
Sparreboom, Cloë L., Niels Komen, Dimitris Rizopoulos, et al.. (2019). Transanal total mesorectal excision: how are we doing so far?. Colorectal Disease. 21(7). 767–774. 13 indexed citations
4.
Sparreboom, Cloë L., Niels Komen, Dimitris Rizopoulos, et al.. (2019). A multicentre cohort study of serum and peritoneal biomarkers to predict anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer resection. Colorectal Disease. 22(1). 36–45. 29 indexed citations
5.
Hilst, Jony van, David J. Brinkman, Thijs de Rooij, et al.. (2019). The inflammatory response after laparoscopic and open pancreatoduodenectomy and the association with complications in a multicenter randomized controlled trial. HPB. 21(11). 1453–1461. 28 indexed citations
6.
Leijtens, Jeroen W. A., T. W. A. Koedam, Wernard A. A. Borstlap, et al.. (2018). Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery with or without Completion Total Mesorectal Excision for T2 and T3 Rectal Carcinoma. Digestive Surgery. 36(1). 76–82. 7 indexed citations
7.
Hilst, Jony van, T. de Rooij, Michael F. Gerhards, et al.. (2018). Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy (LEOPARD-2): a multicenter patient-blinded, randomized controlled trial. HPB. 20. S217–S217. 1 indexed citations
8.
Rooij, Thijs de, Jony van Hilst, Koop Bosscha, et al.. (2018). Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy (LEOPARD-2): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 19(1). 1–1. 60 indexed citations
9.
Vermaas, Maarten, et al.. (2018). Minimally Invasive versus Open Approach for Right-Sided Colectomy: A Study in 12,006 Patients from the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit. Digestive Surgery. 36(1). 27–32. 20 indexed citations
10.
Mungroop, Timothy H., Denise P. Veelo, Olivier R. Busch, et al.. (2016). Continuous wound infiltration versus epidural analgesia after hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery (POP-UP): a randomised controlled, open-label, non-inferiority trial. ˜The œLancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology. 1(2). 105–113. 42 indexed citations
11.
12.
Komen, Niels, Juliette Slieker, P. Willemsen, et al.. (2014). Acute phase proteins in drain fluid: a new screening tool for colorectal anastomotic leakage? The APPEAL study: analysis of parameters predictive for evident anastomotic leakage. The American Journal of Surgery. 208(3). 317–323. 37 indexed citations
13.
Daams, Freek, et al.. (2013). Identification of anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery using microdialysis of the peritoneal cavity. Techniques in Coloproctology. 18(1). 65–71. 17 indexed citations
14.
Slieker, Juliette, Niels Komen, G. H. H. Mannaerts, et al.. (2012). Long-term and Perioperative Corticosteroids in Anastomotic Leakage. Archives of Surgery. 147(5). 447–52. 60 indexed citations
15.
16.
Hemmer, Patrick, Boudewijn van Etten, Jean-Pierre E. N. Pierie, et al.. (2011). Results of Surgery for Perforated Gastroduodenal Ulcers in a Dutch Population. Digestive Surgery. 28(5-6). 360–366. 14 indexed citations
17.
Gooiker, G.A., Lydia G. van der Geest, Michel W.J.M. Wouters, et al.. (2011). Quality Improvement of Pancreatic Surgery by Centralization in the Western Part of the Netherlands. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 18(7). 1821–1829. 54 indexed citations
18.
Lips, Esther H., Ronald van Eijk, Eelco J. R. de Graaf, et al.. (2008). Progression and Tumor Heterogeneity Analysis in Early Rectal Cancer. Clinical Cancer Research. 14(3). 772–781. 35 indexed citations
19.
Lips, Esther H., Ronald van Eijk, Jan Oosting, et al.. (2008). Integrating chromosomal aberrations and gene expression profiles to dissect rectal tumorigenesis. BMC Cancer. 8(1). 314–314. 36 indexed citations
20.
Eijk, Ronald van, Jan Oosting, Károly Szuhai, et al.. (2007). Single nucleotide polymorphism array analysis of chromosomal instability patterns discriminates rectal adenomas from carcinomas. The Journal of Pathology. 212(3). 269–277. 34 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Abhishek D. Parmar Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ido Mizrahi Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Timothy M. Geiger Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Peter Pockney Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Irene Epelboym Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sinziana Dumitra Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by S. Kriwanek Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Hayato Kurihara Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ronald J. Place
Rankless by CCL
2026