Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
COVID-19 and educational inequality: How school closures affect low- and high-achieving students
2021165 citationsElisabeth Grewenig, Philipp Lergetporer et al.European Economic Reviewprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Philipp Lergetporer
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Philipp Lergetporer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philipp Lergetporer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philipp Lergetporer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philipp Lergetporer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philipp Lergetporer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philipp Lergetporer. The network helps show where Philipp Lergetporer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philipp Lergetporer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philipp Lergetporer.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philipp Lergetporer based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Philipp Lergetporer. Philipp Lergetporer is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Wößmann, Ludger, et al.. (2021). Bildungspolitik zur Bewältigung gesellschaftlicher Herausforderungen während und nach Corona – Ergebnisse des ifo Bildungsbarometers 2021. Ifo-Schnelldienst. 74(9). 27–40.1 indexed citations
10.
Wößmann, Ludger, et al.. (2021). Bildung erneut im Lockdown: Wie verbrachten Schulkinder die Schulschließungen Anfang 2021?. Ifo-Schnelldienst. 74(5). 36–52.5 indexed citations
11.
Wößmann, Ludger, et al.. (2020). Deutsche sind für mehr Einheitlichkeit und Vergleichbarkeit im Bildungssystem – Ergebnisse des ifo Bildungsbarometers 2020. Ifo-Schnelldienst. 73(9). 40–48.2 indexed citations
12.
Wößmann, Ludger, et al.. (2020). Bildung in der Coronakrise: Wie haben die Schulkinder die Zeit der Schulschließungen verbracht, und welche Bildungsmaßnahmen befürworten die Deutschen?. Ifo-Schnelldienst. 73(9). 25–39.13 indexed citations
13.
Grewenig, Elisabeth, et al.. (2019). Was die Deutschen über Bildungsungleichheit denken. Econstor (Econstor). 72(17). 27–41.2 indexed citations
Wößmann, Ludger, et al.. (2017). Fürchten sich die Deutschen vor der Digitalisierung? Ergebnisse des ifo Bildungsbarometers 2017. Econstor (Econstor). 70(17). 17–38.3 indexed citations
16.
Lergetporer, Philipp & Ludger Woessmann. (2016). The Political Economy of University Tuition Fees: Information Provision and Income Contingency in Representative Survey Experiments. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.3 indexed citations
17.
Wößmann, Ludger, et al.. (2016). Denken Lehrkräfte anders über die Bildungspolitik als die Gesamtbevölkerung? - Ergebnisse des ifo Bildungsbarometers 2016. Econstor (Econstor). 69(17). 19–34.2 indexed citations
18.
Wößmann, Ludger, et al.. (2016). Bildungsmaßnahmen zur Integration der Flüchtlinge – Was die Deutschen befürworten. Econstor (Econstor). 69(17). 35–43.2 indexed citations
19.
Wößmann, Ludger, et al.. (2015). Deutsche sind zu grundlegenden Bildungsreformen bereit – Ergebnisse des ifo Bildungsbarometers 2015. Econstor (Econstor). 68(17). 29–50.3 indexed citations
20.
Wößmann, Ludger, et al.. (2014). Was die Deutschen über die Bildungspolitik denken – Ergebnisse des ersten ifo Bildungsbarometers. Econstor (Econstor). 67(18). 16–33.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.