Philip R. Shaver

1.9k total citations · 1 hit paper
8 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Philip R. Shaver is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip R. Shaver has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Social Psychology, 4 papers in Clinical Psychology and 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Philip R. Shaver's work include Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (6 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (3 papers) and Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (2 papers). Philip R. Shaver is often cited by papers focused on Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (6 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (3 papers) and Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (2 papers). Philip R. Shaver collaborates with scholars based in United States, Israel and Canada. Philip R. Shaver's co-authors include Mario Mikulincer, Lee A. Kirkpatrick, Cindy Hazan, Audrey Brassard, Marie‐France Lafontaine, Pierre Valois, Susan M. Johnson, Yvan Lussier, Robert B. Zajonc and Carol Tavris and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin and The American Journal of Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Philip R. Shaver

8 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Hit Papers

An attachment perspective... 2012 2026 2016 2021 2012 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Philip R. Shaver United States 7 817 712 309 307 199 8 1.3k
Robin A. Barry United States 21 820 1.0× 1.0k 1.4× 290 0.9× 151 0.5× 193 1.0× 48 1.6k
Clifford I. Notarius United States 15 918 1.1× 680 1.0× 412 1.3× 181 0.6× 199 1.0× 20 1.4k
Penny Munn United Kingdom 14 777 1.0× 1.1k 1.5× 268 0.9× 240 0.8× 348 1.7× 25 2.0k
Sharon Bond Canada 8 660 0.8× 678 1.0× 231 0.7× 125 0.4× 141 0.7× 14 1.2k
Richard Beck United States 16 582 0.7× 668 0.9× 351 1.1× 551 1.8× 217 1.1× 38 1.3k
Amanda M. Vicary United States 9 1.0k 1.3× 773 1.1× 349 1.1× 111 0.4× 359 1.8× 13 1.4k
William J. Lyddon United States 22 766 0.9× 1.3k 1.9× 222 0.7× 95 0.3× 247 1.2× 60 1.8k
Saralea E. Chazan United States 12 597 0.7× 679 1.0× 206 0.7× 77 0.3× 181 0.9× 32 1.1k
Nan Stevens Netherlands 16 629 0.8× 605 0.8× 461 1.5× 486 1.6× 167 0.8× 22 1.6k
Emre Selçuk Türkiye 17 833 1.0× 428 0.6× 264 0.9× 160 0.5× 320 1.6× 41 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Philip R. Shaver

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip R. Shaver's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip R. Shaver with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip R. Shaver more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip R. Shaver

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip R. Shaver. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip R. Shaver. The network helps show where Philip R. Shaver may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip R. Shaver

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip R. Shaver. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip R. Shaver based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip R. Shaver. Philip R. Shaver is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Cassidy, Jude, Jessica Stern, Mario Mikulincer, David R. Martin, & Philip R. Shaver. (2017). Influences on Care for Others: Attachment Security, Personal Suffering, and Similarity Between Helper and Care Recipient. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 44(4). 574–588. 20 indexed citations
2.
Lafontaine, Marie‐France, Audrey Brassard, Yvan Lussier, et al.. (2015). Selecting the Best Items for a Short-Form of the Experiences in Close Relationships Questionnaire. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 32(2). 140–154. 166 indexed citations
3.
Mikulincer, Mario & Philip R. Shaver. (2012). An attachment perspective on psychopathology. World Psychiatry. 11(1). 11–15. 593 indexed citations breakdown →
4.
Shaver, Philip R., et al.. (1995). Attachment Theory and Counseling Psychology. The Counseling Psychologist. 23(3). 491–500. 10 indexed citations
5.
Hazan, Cindy & Philip R. Shaver. (1994). Deeper Into Attachment Theory. Psychological Inquiry. 5(1). 68–79. 120 indexed citations
6.
Kirkpatrick, Lee A. & Philip R. Shaver. (1992). An Attachment-Theoretical Approach to Romantic Love and Religious Belief. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 18(3). 266–275. 281 indexed citations
7.
Zajonc, Robert B., et al.. (1972). Exposure, satiation, and stimulus discriminability.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 21(3). 270–280. 68 indexed citations
8.
Shaver, Philip R., Peter Warr, & Christopher K. Knapper. (1971). The Perception of People and Events. The American Journal of Psychology. 84(4). 591–591. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026