Amanda M. Vicary
- Social Psychology top 1%
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Demography top 2%
- Co-authors
- R. Chris FraleyClaudia Chloe BrumbaughMarie E. HeffernanMichael J. MarksGlenn I. RoismanPaula M. NiedenthalNathan W. HudsonBülent Turan
- Topics
- Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (8 papers)Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (8 papers)Personality Traits and Psychology (3 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyPersonality and Social Psychology BulletinJournal of Personality
- Partner nations
- United StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
Amanda M. Vicary
13 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Social Psychology 1.0k
- Clinical Psychology 773
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 359
- Sociology and Political Science 349
- Demography 214
Countries citing papers authored by Amanda M. Vicary
This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda M. Vicary's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda M. Vicary with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda M. Vicary more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda M. Vicary
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda M. Vicary. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda M. Vicary. The network helps show where Amanda M. Vicary may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amanda M. Vicary
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amanda M. Vicary. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amanda M. Vicary based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amanda M. Vicary. Amanda M. Vicary is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The CSI Effect: An Investigation into the Relationship between Watching Crime Shows and Forensic Knowledge | 4 |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 31 | |
| 5 | 40 | |
| 6 | The experiences in close relationships—Relationship Structures Questionnaire: A method for assessing attachment orientations across relationships.breakdown → | 789 |
| 7 | 201 | |
| 8 | 51 | |
| 9 | 29 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 45 | |
| 13 | 221 |
About Amanda M. Vicary
Amanda M. Vicary is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (8 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (8 papers) and Personality Traits and Psychology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (1.0k citations), Clinical Psychology (773 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (359 citations). Amanda M. Vicary has collaborated with scholars based in United States and France. Frequent co-authors include R. Chris Fraley, Claudia Chloe Brumbaugh, Marie E. Heffernan, Michael J. Marks, Glenn I. Roisman, Paula M. Niedenthal, Nathan W. Hudson, Bülent Turan and Erin A. Vogel. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin and Journal of Personality.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.