Philip M. Remes

1.8k total citations · 1 hit paper
21 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Philip M. Remes is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Molecular Biology and Animal Science and Zoology. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip M. Remes has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Spectroscopy, 11 papers in Molecular Biology and 6 papers in Animal Science and Zoology. Recurrent topics in Philip M. Remes's work include Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (20 papers), Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (14 papers) and Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (7 papers). Philip M. Remes is often cited by papers focused on Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (20 papers), Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (14 papers) and Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (7 papers). Philip M. Remes collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and Israel. Philip M. Remes's co-authors include Alexander Makarov, Oliver Lange, Stevan Horning, Eduard Denisov, Jae C. Schwartz, Matthias Mann, Eugen Damoc, Michael W. Senko, Rosa Viner and Jesper V. Olsen and has published in prestigious journals such as Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Nature Communications and Analytical Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

Philip M. Remes

16 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories sort by overperformance

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

A Dual Pressure Linear Ion Trap Orbitrap Instrument with Very High Sequencing Speed

2009 372 citations Jesper V. Olsen, Jae C. Schwartz et al. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Philip M. Remes United States	11	779	702	71	71	53	21	1.1k
Michael W. Belford United States	13	817 1.0×	654 0.9×	65 0.9×	94 1.3×	38 0.7×	20	1.1k
Daniel A. Polasky United States	17	768 1.0×	934 1.3×	69 1.0×	75 1.1×	75 1.4×	30	1.3k
Romain Huguet United States	20	1.2k 1.5×	1.3k 1.8×	79 1.1×	161 2.3×	69 1.3×	37	2.1k
Jean‐Jacques Dunyach United States	11	588 0.8×	465 0.7×	50 0.7×	60 0.8×	28 0.5×	15	808
Adam D. Catherman United States	18	1.3k 1.7×	1.2k 1.7×	77 1.1×	137 1.9×	67 1.3×	22	1.8k
Lukasz G. Migas United States	18	706 0.9×	750 1.1×	83 1.2×	68 1.0×	15 0.3×	33	1.1k
Jason M. Hogan United States	17	903 1.2×	733 1.0×	93 1.3×	76 1.1×	94 1.8×	30	1.3k
Aneika C. Leney United Kingdom	16	530 0.7×	804 1.1×	85 1.2×	44 0.6×	54 1.0×	29	1.1k
Wen Yu United States	15	887 1.1×	751 1.1×	45 0.6×	52 0.7×	32 0.6×	19	1.3k
Susan E. Abbatiello United States	16	797 1.0×	883 1.3×	22 0.3×	73 1.0×	72 1.4×	19	1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Philip M. Remes

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip M. Remes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip M. Remes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip M. Remes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip M. Remes

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip M. Remes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip M. Remes. The network helps show where Philip M. Remes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip M. Remes

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip M. Remes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip M. Remes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip M. Remes. Philip M. Remes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Hsu, Chris, Nicholas Shulman, Hamish Stewart, et al.. (2025). Evaluation of a Prototype Orbitrap Astral Zoom Mass Spectrometer for Quantitative Proteomics─Beyond Identification Lists. Journal of Proteome Research. 24(11). 5742–5754.

Heil, Lilian R., et al.. (2025). Rapid assay development for low input targeted proteomics using a versatile linear ion trap. Nature Communications. 16(1). 3794–3794. 2 indexed citations

Fu, Qin, Philip M. Remes, Jihyeon Lee, et al.. (2025). Development and Clinical Evaluation of a Multiplexed Health Surveillance Panel Using Ultra High‐Throughput PRM‐MS in an Inflammatory Bowel Disease Cohort. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 64(46). e202507610–e202507610.

Zhang, Qi, Thao Nguyen, Jessica Wang, et al.. (2025). Expanding Targeted Instrumentation for Discovery Applications: Complement Reporter Ion Quantification with a Quadrupole–Ion Trap Instrument. Journal of Proteome Research. 24(9). 4611–4622.

Wahle, Maria, Philip M. Remes, Johannes B. Mueller‐Reif, et al.. (2025). A Novel Hybrid High-Speed Mass Spectrometer Allows Rapid Translation From Biomarker Candidates to Targeted Clinical Tests Using 15N-Labeled Proteins. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. 24(9). 101050–101050.

Remes, Philip M., et al.. (2024). Hybrid Quadrupole Mass Filter–Radial Ejection Linear Ion Trap and Intelligent Data Acquisition Enable Highly Multiplex Targeted Proteomics. Journal of Proteome Research. 23(12). 5476–5486. 7 indexed citations

Heil, Lilian R., Philip M. Remes, Jesse D. Canterbury, et al.. (2023). Dynamic Data-Independent Acquisition Mass Spectrometry with Real-Time Retrospective Alignment. Analytical Chemistry. 95(32). 11854–11858. 7 indexed citations

Heil, Lilian R., Philip M. Remes, & Michael J. MacCoss. (2021). Comparison of Unit Resolution Versus High-Resolution Accurate Mass for Parallel Reaction Monitoring. Journal of Proteome Research. 20(9). 4435–4442. 18 indexed citations

Gault, Joseph, Idlir Liko, Michael Landreh, et al.. (2020). Combining native and ‘omics’ mass spectrometry to identify endogenous ligands bound to membrane proteins. Nature Methods. 17(5). 505–508. 131 indexed citations

10.

Remes, Philip M., Ping Yip, & Michael J. MacCoss. (2020). Highly Multiplex Targeted Proteomics Enabled by Real-Time Chromatographic Alignment. Analytical Chemistry. 92(17). 11809–11817. 19 indexed citations

11.

Remes, Philip M.. (2019). Instrumentation and methods for the characterization of ion structure and internal energy in the gas phase. Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill).

12.

Remes, Philip M., et al.. (2014). Insight into the resonance ejection process during mass analysis through simulations for improved linear quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometer performance. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry. 370. 44–57. 22 indexed citations

13.

Remes, Philip M., et al.. (2014). Re-print of “Insight into the Resonance Ejection Process during Mass Analysis through Simulations for Improved Linear Quadrupole Ion Trap Mass Spectrometer Performance”. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry. 377. 368–384. 6 indexed citations

14.

Senko, Michael W., Philip M. Remes, Jesse D. Canterbury, et al.. (2013). Novel Parallelized Quadrupole/Linear Ion Trap/Orbitrap Tribrid Mass Spectrometer Improving Proteome Coverage and Peptide Identification Rates. Analytical Chemistry. 85(24). 11710–11714. 181 indexed citations

15.

Michalski, Annette, Eugen Damoc, Oliver Lange, et al.. (2011). Ultra High Resolution Linear Ion Trap Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer (Orbitrap Elite) Facilitates Top Down LC MS/MS and Versatile Peptide Fragmentation Modes. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. 11(3). O111.013698–O111.013698. 282 indexed citations

16.

Bereman, Michael S., Jesse D. Canterbury, Jarrett D. Egertson, et al.. (2011). Evaluation of Front-End Higher Energy Collision-Induced Dissociation on a Benchtop Dual-Pressure Linear Ion Trap Mass Spectrometer for Shotgun Proteomics. Analytical Chemistry. 84(3). 1533–1539. 14 indexed citations

17.

Olsen, Jesper V., Jae C. Schwartz, Jens Griep‐Raming, et al.. (2009). A Dual Pressure Linear Ion Trap Orbitrap Instrument with Very High Sequencing Speed. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. 8(12). 2759–2769. 372 indexed citations breakdown →

18.

Remes, Philip M. & Gary L. Glish. (2009). Mapping the Distribution of Ion Positions as a Function of Quadrupole Ion Trap Mass Spectrometer Operating Parameters to Optimize Infrared Multiphoton Dissociation. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 113(15). 3447–3454. 16 indexed citations

19.

Remes, Philip M. & Gary L. Glish. (2007). Collisional cooling in a quadrupole ion trap at sub-ambient temperatures. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry. 265(2-3). 176–181. 14 indexed citations

20.

Remes, Philip M., et al.. (2006). Thermally Assisted Collision-Induced Dissociation in a Quadrupole Ion Trap Mass Spectrometer. Analytical Chemistry. 78(13). 4609–4614. 19 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact