Michael Goodwin
Impact in
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 5%
- Reproductive Physiology in Livestock
- Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
- Spectroscopy top 10%
- Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
- Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
- Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies 2
-
- Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications 4
- Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography 2
- Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications 2
- Co-authors
- J. R. Chenault (1 shared paper)D. D. Kratzer (1 shared paper)Kim M. Gooding (1 shared paper)Fred E. Regnier (1 shared paper)Delbert D. Thiessen (1 shared paper)Steven P. Swanson (1 shared paper)Todd A. Gillespie (1 shared paper)John T. Catlow (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry (2 papers)Nature Methods (1 paper)Theriogenology (1 paper)Analytical Chemistry (1 paper)The Annals of Thoracic Surgery (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSweden
In The Last Decade
Michael Goodwin
11 papers receiving 521 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Agronomy and Crop Science 142
- Spectroscopy 122
- Sensory Systems 32
- Biological Psychiatry 13
- Genetics 131
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Goodwin
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Goodwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Goodwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Goodwin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Goodwin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Goodwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Goodwin. The network helps show where Michael Goodwin may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Goodwin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 131 | |
| 2 | 1990 | 121 | |
| 3 | 1995 | 95 | |
| 4 | 1979 | 57 | |
| 5 | 1976 | 56 | |
| 6 | 1992 | 53 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 15 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 11 | 1995 | 1 |
About Michael Goodwin
Michael Goodwin is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Spectroscopy, Agronomy and Crop Science, Small Animals and Analytical Chemistry, having authored 11 papers that have together received 544 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (2 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (2 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (2 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (2 papers), Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (2 papers) and Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (142 citations), Spectroscopy (122 citations), Sensory Systems (32 citations), Biological Psychiatry (13 citations) and Genetics (131 citations). Michael Goodwin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include J. R. Chenault, D. D. Kratzer, Kim M. Gooding, Fred E. Regnier, Delbert D. Thiessen, Steven P. Swanson, Todd A. Gillespie, John T. Catlow, W.M. Moseley and Romain Huguet. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, Nature Methods, Theriogenology, Analytical Chemistry and The Annals of Thoracic Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.