Philip Kraft

17 papers receiving 359 citations

Peers

Philip Kraft
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Sociology and Political Science 230
  • Management Information Systems 57
  • Public Administration 54
  • Information Systems 50
  • Computer Science Applications 50
Replace Christopher Barnatt with:
Christopher Barnatt United Kingdom
Annemette Kjærgaard Denmark
Tom Forester Australia
Mats Edenius Sweden
Lawrence Gales United States
Celia T. Romm Australia
Ursula Holtgrewe Austria
Margaret Kling Australia
Gianluigi Mangia Italy
Ursula Plesner Denmark
Philip Kraft relative to Christopher Barnatt United Kingdom Christopher Barnatt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Christopher Barnatt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Kraft

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Kraft's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Kraft with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Kraft more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Kraft

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Kraft. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Kraft. The network helps show where Philip Kraft may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Kraft

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Kraft. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Kraft based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Kraft. Philip Kraft is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 47
2
Critical Study Of Work
1
3
Privilege and invisibility in the New Work order: a reply to Kyng
13
4
Postmodern Management and Information Technology in the Modern Industrial Corporation
12
5 8
6 2
7
The Collective Resource Approach: The Scandinavian Experience
39
8 17
9 29
10
The use of legal rhetoric in a clinical setting: advocating the advocates.
1
11 19
12 11
13 19
14 5
15 23
16
Programmers and Managers: The Routinization of Computer Programming in the United States
94
17 102
18
Organization Change through Job Enrichment.
1

About Philip Kraft

Philip Kraft is a scholar working on Public Administration, Computer Science Applications and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 18 papers that have together received 443 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor Movements and Unions (2 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (2 papers) and Open Source Software Innovations (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (54 citations), Computer Science Applications (50 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (36 citations). Philip Kraft has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Jørgen P. Bansler, Charles Koeber, Michael C. Dreiling, James G. Scott, Duane Truex, David Brody, Heinz K. Klein, Svetozar Pejovich and Bernhard Wilpert. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Journal of the Association for Information Systems and Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026