Philip Foster

1.3k citations
50 papers · 786 indexed · h-index 14
Topics
Global Educational Policies and Reforms (11 papers)Education Systems and Policy (11 papers)Religious Education and Schools (8 papers)

In The Last Decade

Philip Foster

42 papers receiving 523 citations

Peers

Philip Foster
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Education 404
  • Sociology and Political Science 254
  • Political Science and International Relations 227
  • Safety Research 132
  • Demography 89
Replace John Middleton with:
John Middleton United States
Mario Novelli United Kingdom
Pal Ahluwalia Australia
Charlotte H. Bruner
Mayssoun Sukarieh United Kingdom
Carlos G. Vélez‐Ibáñez United States
Michael Neocosmos South Africa
Aleksandra Ålund Sweden
Sam C. Nolutshungu United Kingdom
Oyèrónkẹ́ Oyěwùmí United States
Philip Foster relative to John Middleton United States John Middleton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
John Middleton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Foster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Foster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Foster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Foster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Foster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Foster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Foster. The network helps show where Philip Foster may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Foster

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Foster. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Foster based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Foster. Philip Foster is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 2
2 0
3 0
4 6
5 38
6 1
7 5
8 42
9 61
10
Education and rural development
1
11
Education and development in rural Kenya : a study of primary school graduates
2
12 3
13 2
14 4
15
Population growth and rural development in Buganda: a simulation of a micro-socio-economic system.
2
16
The fortunate few : a study of secondary schools and students in the Ivory Coast
30
17 66
18 1
19 3
20 30

About Philip Foster

Philip Foster is a scholar working on Education, Safety Research and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 50 papers that have together received 786 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Educational Policies and Reforms (11 papers), Education Systems and Policy (11 papers) and Religious Education and Schools (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (132 citations), Education (404 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (227 citations). Philip Foster has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include L. J. Lewis, Rémi Clignet, Gustav Jahoda, Harold J. Noah, Max A. Eckstein, Lionel Tiger, Craig A. Anderson, K. A. Busia, Aristide R. Zolberg and Martín Carnoy. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, American Sociological Review and American Journal of Sociology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026