Philip English

44 total papers · 1.6k total citations
21 papers, 811 citations indexed

About

Philip English is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Epidemiology and Psychiatry and Mental health. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip English has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 811 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 5 papers in Epidemiology and 5 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health. Recurrent topics in Philip English's work include Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (4 papers) and Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers). Philip English is often cited by papers focused on Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (4 papers) and Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers). Philip English collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and United States. Philip English's co-authors include Michael Firbank, John T. O’Brien, Thaı́s Minett, A. Gholkar, Roy Taylor, Andrew Teodorczuk, Mani Krishnan, Ravikumar Balasubramanian, R. M. Harrison and Andrew M. Blamire and has published in prestigious journals such as NeuroImage, Neurology and Diabetes.

In The Last Decade

Philip English

21 papers receiving 796 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Philip English 206 176 175 147 119 21 811
Ana Rubio 180 0.9× 196 1.1× 139 0.8× 87 0.6× 287 2.4× 39 995
Wouter S. Hoogenboom 102 0.5× 107 0.6× 102 0.6× 214 1.5× 225 1.9× 17 788
Weihua Meng 223 1.1× 128 0.7× 224 1.3× 246 1.7× 88 0.7× 41 1.0k
J. P. Deruaz 91 0.4× 50 0.3× 177 1.0× 69 0.5× 146 1.2× 26 931
Meng‐Hsiang Chen 168 0.8× 96 0.5× 87 0.5× 187 1.3× 291 2.4× 51 786
John Howieson 84 0.4× 188 1.1× 95 0.5× 102 0.7× 271 2.3× 35 906
C M Shaw 137 0.7× 102 0.6× 150 0.9× 85 0.6× 191 1.6× 36 927
Morten Ziebell 82 0.4× 196 1.1× 137 0.8× 152 1.0× 279 2.3× 46 762
Ayşe Sağduyu Kocaman 124 0.6× 165 0.9× 160 0.9× 55 0.4× 266 2.2× 39 831
Yang‐Chyuan Chang 241 1.2× 164 0.9× 150 0.9× 54 0.4× 376 3.2× 20 947

Countries citing papers authored by Philip English

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip English's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip English with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip English more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip English

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip English. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip English. The network helps show where Philip English may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip English

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip English. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip English based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip English. Philip English is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026