Freya E. Cooper

457 total citations
8 papers, 336 citations indexed

About

Freya E. Cooper is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Neurology. According to data from OpenAlex, Freya E. Cooper has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 336 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 3 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 3 papers in Neurology. Recurrent topics in Freya E. Cooper's work include Neuroscience and Music Perception (5 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (3 papers) and Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (3 papers). Freya E. Cooper is often cited by papers focused on Neuroscience and Music Perception (5 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (3 papers) and Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (3 papers). Freya E. Cooper collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and United States. Freya E. Cooper's co-authors include Manon Grube, Timothy D. Griffiths, Patrick F. Chinnery, Sukhbinder Kumar, Thomas P. Kelly, John L. Welch, Katharina von Kriegstein, Philip English, Arnab Mandal and David J. Burn and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Freya E. Cooper

8 papers receiving 330 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Freya E. Cooper United Kingdom 8 253 82 54 53 38 8 336
Amanda Reed United States 6 357 1.4× 43 0.5× 46 0.9× 102 1.9× 25 0.7× 7 398
Sara Guediche United States 11 262 1.0× 66 0.8× 132 2.4× 15 0.3× 55 1.4× 20 358
Elijah A. Petter United States 9 292 1.2× 53 0.6× 32 0.6× 135 2.5× 10 0.3× 12 391
Dilshat Abla Japan 10 346 1.4× 27 0.3× 74 1.4× 36 0.7× 104 2.7× 15 435
Bethany Plakke United States 11 315 1.2× 32 0.4× 85 1.6× 67 1.3× 9 0.2× 20 407
Abigail Dickinson United States 13 477 1.9× 32 0.4× 19 0.4× 82 1.5× 53 1.4× 33 567
Nelly Amador United States 5 558 2.2× 71 0.9× 38 0.7× 99 1.9× 19 0.5× 6 609
Naomi S. Kort United States 7 300 1.2× 22 0.3× 40 0.7× 61 1.2× 10 0.3× 9 371
Matthew L. Richardson United States 8 264 1.0× 42 0.5× 115 2.1× 22 0.4× 38 1.0× 23 319
Nicholas A. Lusk United States 7 276 1.1× 53 0.6× 28 0.5× 103 1.9× 6 0.2× 12 362

Countries citing papers authored by Freya E. Cooper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Freya E. Cooper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Freya E. Cooper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Freya E. Cooper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Freya E. Cooper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Freya E. Cooper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Freya E. Cooper. The network helps show where Freya E. Cooper may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Freya E. Cooper

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Freya E. Cooper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Freya E. Cooper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Freya E. Cooper. Freya E. Cooper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Cope, Thomas, Manon Grube, Arnab Mandal, et al.. (2014). Subthalamic deep brain stimulation in Parkinson׳s disease has no significant effect on perceptual timing in the hundreds of milliseconds range. Neuropsychologia. 57. 29–37. 9 indexed citations
2.
Grube, Manon, et al.. (2013). Exploring the role of auditory analysis in atypical compared to typical language development. Hearing Research. 308. 129–140. 14 indexed citations
3.
Grube, Manon, Freya E. Cooper, & Timothy D. Griffiths. (2013). Auditory temporal-regularity processing correlates with language and literacy skill in early adulthood. Cognitive Neuroscience. 4(3-4). 225–230. 26 indexed citations
4.
Grube, Manon, et al.. (2012). Auditory sequence analysis and phonological skill. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 279(1746). 4496–4504. 38 indexed citations
5.
Cooper, Freya E., Manon Grube, Katharina von Kriegstein, et al.. (2011). Distinct critical cerebellar subregions for components of verbal working memory. Neuropsychologia. 50(1). 189–197. 47 indexed citations
6.
Grube, Manon, Freya E. Cooper, Patrick F. Chinnery, & Timothy D. Griffiths. (2010). Dissociation of duration-based and beat-based auditory timing in cerebellar degeneration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 107(25). 11597–11601. 147 indexed citations
7.
Cooper, Freya E., Manon Grube, John L. Welch, et al.. (2010). The contribution of the cerebellum to cognition in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 6.. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 23(1-2). 3–15. 30 indexed citations
8.
Cooper, Freya E., Manon Grube, John L. Welch, et al.. (2010). The Contribution of the Cerebellum to Cognition in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 6. Behavioural Neurology. 23(1-2). 3–15. 25 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026