Philip Dewe

5.0k total citations · 2 hit papers
60 papers, 3.2k citations indexed

About

Philip Dewe is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip Dewe has authored 60 papers receiving a total of 3.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in General Health Professions, 20 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and 9 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Philip Dewe's work include Workplace Health and Well-being (20 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (17 papers) and Labor Movements and Unions (6 papers). Philip Dewe is often cited by papers focused on Workplace Health and Well-being (20 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (17 papers) and Labor Movements and Unions (6 papers). Philip Dewe collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and Australia. Philip Dewe's co-authors include Cary L. Cooper, Michael P. O’Driscoll, David Guest, Tom Cox, Linda Trenberth, Juliet Hassard, Gintare Visockaite, Kevin Teoh, Neil Conway and Eamonn Ferguson and has published in prestigious journals such as Social Science & Medicine, Journal of Business Ethics and Journal of Organizational Behavior.

In The Last Decade

Philip Dewe

59 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Hit Papers

Organizational Stress: A Review and Critique of Theory, R... 2001 2026 2009 2017 2001 2017 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Philip Dewe New Zealand 28 1.3k 1.2k 1.1k 644 493 60 3.2k
Mark V. Roehling United States 21 745 0.6× 1.9k 1.6× 887 0.8× 832 1.3× 700 1.4× 45 3.5k
Debra L. Nelson United States 35 1.0k 0.8× 1.8k 1.5× 1.4k 1.4× 1.0k 1.6× 546 1.1× 75 4.0k
Rob B. Briner United Kingdom 30 808 0.6× 1.7k 1.5× 956 0.9× 955 1.5× 233 0.5× 55 3.5k
Roy Payne United Kingdom 35 2.1k 1.6× 1.7k 1.4× 1.5k 1.4× 826 1.3× 543 1.1× 87 4.9k
Robert Rosenthal United States 5 922 0.7× 1.9k 1.6× 1.2k 1.1× 1.4k 2.2× 376 0.8× 7 4.1k
Cynthia L. Cordes United States 6 1.3k 1.0× 1.5k 1.3× 1.0k 1.0× 770 1.2× 383 0.8× 6 2.7k
Лаура Боргогни Italy 27 602 0.5× 1.3k 1.1× 1.3k 1.2× 521 0.8× 641 1.3× 80 3.0k
María José Chambel Portugal 30 1.1k 0.9× 1.8k 1.5× 1.1k 1.1× 943 1.5× 502 1.0× 154 3.2k
Paul J. G. Schreurs Netherlands 15 1.4k 1.1× 1.4k 1.2× 1.2k 1.1× 531 0.8× 408 0.8× 20 2.8k
Cary Cherniss United States 24 1.1k 0.9× 911 0.8× 1.8k 1.7× 509 0.8× 856 1.7× 57 3.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Dewe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Dewe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Dewe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Dewe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Dewe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Dewe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Dewe. The network helps show where Philip Dewe may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Dewe

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Dewe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Dewe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Dewe. Philip Dewe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hassard, Juliet, Kevin Teoh, Gintare Visockaite, Philip Dewe, & Tom Cox. (2017). The cost of work-related stress to society: A systematic review.. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 23(1). 1–17. 395 indexed citations breakdown →
2.
Hassard, Juliet, Kevin Teoh, Gintare Visockaite, Philip Dewe, & Tom Cox. (2017). The cost of work-related stress: a systematic review. 5 indexed citations
3.
Davey, Kate Mackenzie, et al.. (2015). Cultural difference on the table. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management. 15(3). 305–328. 4 indexed citations
4.
Garr, Rosaline & Philip Dewe. (2013). A qualitative study of mentoring and career progression among junior medical doctors. International Journal of Medical Education. 4. 247–252. 8 indexed citations
5.
Dewe, Philip & Linda Trenberth. (2012). Exploring the relationships between appraisals of stressful encounters and the associated emotions in a work setting. Work & Stress. 26(2). 161–174. 7 indexed citations
6.
Dewe, Philip & Cary L. Cooper. (2012). Well-Being and Work. Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks. 17 indexed citations
7.
Trenberth, Linda & Philip Dewe. (2006). Understanding the experience of stressors: The use of sequential analysis for exploring the patterns between various work stressors and strain. Work & Stress. 20(3). 191–209. 10 indexed citations
8.
Dewe, Philip & Linda Trenberth. (2005). An exploration of the role of leisure in coping with work related stress using sequential tree analysis. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling. 33(1). 101–116. 25 indexed citations
9.
Dewe, Philip, et al.. (2004). Valuing Human Resources (ACCA Research Report). Open Research Online (The Open University). 3 indexed citations
10.
Dewe, Philip. (2004). Work stress and coping: theory, research and practice. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling. 32(2). 139–142. 33 indexed citations
11.
Toulson, Paul & Philip Dewe. (2004). HR accounting as a measurement tool. Human Resource Management Journal. 14(2). 75–90. 38 indexed citations
12.
Dewe, Philip. (2001). DETERMINANTS OF COPING: SOME ALTERNATIVE EXPLANATIONS AND MEASUREMENT ISSUES. Psychological Reports. 88(3). 832–832. 1 indexed citations
13.
Trenberth, Linda, Philip Dewe, & Frank H. Walkey. (1999). . International Journal of Stress Management. 6(2). 89–103. 39 indexed citations
14.
Still, Leonie, Judy McGregor, & Philip Dewe. (1994). Room at the Top?: A Comparison of the Employment Status of Women in Management in Australia and New Zealand. International journal of employment studies. 2(2). 267. 3 indexed citations
15.
Dewe, Philip, Tom Cox, & Eamonn Ferguson. (1993). Individual strategies for coping with stress at work: A review. Work & Stress. 7(1). 5–15. 98 indexed citations
16.
Dewe, Philip. (1993). Coping and the intensity of nursing stressors. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. 3(4). 299–311. 15 indexed citations
17.
Dewe, Philip. (1992). The appraisal process: Exploring the role of meaning, importance, control and coping in work stress. Anxiety Stress & Coping. 5(1). 95–109. 28 indexed citations
18.
Guest, David & Philip Dewe. (1991). Company or Trade Union: Which Wins Workers' Allegiance? A Study of Commitment in the UK Electronics Industry. British Journal of Industrial Relations. 29(1). 75–96. 49 indexed citations
19.
Dewe, Philip. (1989). Stressor frequency, tension, tiredness and coping: some measurement issues and a comparison across nursing groups. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 14(4). 308–320. 40 indexed citations
20.
Dewe, Philip. (1988). Investigating the frequency of nursing stressors: A comparison across wards. Social Science & Medicine. 26(3). 375–380. 26 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026