Philip B. Mead
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Physiology top 5%
- Surgery
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Brian S. FlynnRoger H. Secker‐WalkerLaura J. SolomonWashington C. WinnJoan M. SkellyPamela M. VacekB. Frank PolkAnn W. Hsing
- Topics
- Smoking Behavior and Cessation (8 papers)Neonatal and Maternal Infections (8 papers)Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (7 papers)
- Journals
- American Journal of Obstetrics and GynecologyAmerican Journal of Preventive MedicineObstetrics and Gynecology
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Philip B. Mead
40 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 480
- Epidemiology 419
- Physiology 401
- Surgery 173
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 160
Countries citing papers authored by Philip B. Mead
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip B. Mead's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip B. Mead with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip B. Mead more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip B. Mead
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip B. Mead. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip B. Mead. The network helps show where Philip B. Mead may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip B. Mead
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip B. Mead. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip B. Mead based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip B. Mead. Philip B. Mead is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 16 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | Protocols for infectious diseases in obstetrics and gynecology | 6 |
| 6 | 75 | |
| 7 | 60 | |
| 8 | 26 | |
| 9 | 57 | |
| 10 | 61 | |
| 11 | 21 | |
| 12 | 80 | |
| 13 | 19 | |
| 14 | 196 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | 40 | |
| 18 | 19 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | Prophylactic antibiotics and antibiotic resistance. | 15 |
About Philip B. Mead
Philip B. Mead is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 42 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Smoking Behavior and Cessation (8 papers), Neonatal and Maternal Infections (8 papers) and Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (135 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (160 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (480 citations). Philip B. Mead has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Brian S. Flynn, Roger H. Secker‐Walker, Laura J. Solomon, Washington C. Winn, Joan M. Skelly, Pamela M. Vacek, B. Frank Polk, Ann W. Hsing, David A. Eschenbach and George Knox. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, American Journal of Preventive Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.