Berta M. Geller

10.0k total citations · 2 hit papers
143 papers, 7.6k citations indexed

About

Berta M. Geller is a scholar working on Oncology, Artificial Intelligence and Cancer Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Berta M. Geller has authored 143 papers receiving a total of 7.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 114 papers in Oncology, 44 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 35 papers in Cancer Research. Recurrent topics in Berta M. Geller's work include Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (101 papers), AI in cancer detection (44 papers) and Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (35 papers). Berta M. Geller is often cited by papers focused on Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (101 papers), AI in cancer detection (44 papers) and Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (35 papers). Berta M. Geller collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Norway. Berta M. Geller's co-authors include Patricia A. Carney, Karla Kerlikowske, Bonnie C. Yankaskas, Robert Rosenberg, Diana L. Miglioretti, Rachel Ballard‐Barbash, Pamela M. Vacek, William E. Barlow, Linn Abraham and Joann G. Elmore and has published in prestigious journals such as JAMA, Journal of Clinical Oncology and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

In The Last Decade

Berta M. Geller

143 papers receiving 7.3k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Individual and Combined Effects of Age, Breast Density, and Hormone Replacement Therapy Use on the Accuracy of Screening Mammography

2003 882 citations Patricia A. Carney, Diana L. Miglioretti et al. profile →
Diagnostic Concordance Among Pathologists Interpreting Breast Biopsy Specimens

2015 440 citations Joann G. Elmore, Patricia A. Carney et al. profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Berta M. Geller United States	45	4.3k	2.5k	2.0k	1.8k	1.4k	143	7.6k
Brian L. Sprague United States	47	4.1k 1.0×	1.7k 0.7×	2.1k 1.0×	1.3k 0.7×	1.4k 1.0×	197	7.8k
Diana S.M. Buist United States	59	5.9k 1.4×	2.2k 0.9×	2.9k 1.4×	2.1k 1.2×	2.8k 2.0×	293	11.5k
Bonnie C. Yankaskas United States	36	3.3k 0.8×	2.2k 0.9×	2.4k 1.2×	1.8k 1.0×	1.1k 0.8×	107	6.6k
David Tritchler Canada	34	2.2k 0.5×	1.4k 0.6×	2.1k 1.0×	736 0.4×	1.0k 0.7×	84	5.6k
Stephen H. Taplin United States	56	5.9k 1.4×	1.4k 0.6×	1.8k 0.9×	1.1k 0.6×	1.1k 0.8×	169	9.3k
Gina Lockwood Canada	48	2.8k 0.7×	866 0.3×	3.5k 1.7×	1.4k 0.8×	829 0.6×	136	8.3k
Solveig Hofvind Norway	41	3.4k 0.8×	2.7k 1.1×	2.7k 1.3×	1.9k 1.1×	1.2k 0.8×	222	6.1k
Emily F. Conant United States	52	3.5k 0.8×	4.8k 1.9×	5.0k 2.4×	4.6k 2.6×	1.7k 1.2×	226	10.4k
Jeffrey A. Tice United States	41	2.2k 0.5×	795 0.3×	1.2k 0.6×	679 0.4×	773 0.5×	123	6.3k
Làszló Tabár Sweden	49	6.8k 1.6×	2.1k 0.8×	1.8k 0.9×	1.5k 0.8×	2.9k 2.0×	149	9.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Berta M. Geller

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Berta M. Geller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Berta M. Geller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Berta M. Geller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Berta M. Geller

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Berta M. Geller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Berta M. Geller. The network helps show where Berta M. Geller may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Berta M. Geller

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Berta M. Geller. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Berta M. Geller based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Berta M. Geller. Berta M. Geller is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Oh, Hannah, Shaoqi Fan, Roni T. Falk, et al.. (2020). Relationship of Serum Progesterone and Progesterone Metabolites with Mammographic Breast Density and Terminal Ductal Lobular Unit Involution among Women Undergoing Diagnostic Breast Biopsy. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 9(1). 245–245. 7 indexed citations

Schapira, Marilyn M., William E. Barlow, Emily F. Conant, et al.. (2018). Communication Practices of Mammography Facilities and Timely Follow-up of a Screening Mammogram with a BI-RADS 0 Assessment. Academic Radiology. 25(9). 1118–1127. 13 indexed citations

Gierach, Gretchen L., Berta M. Geller, John Shepherd, et al.. (2014). Comparison of Mammographic Density Assessed as Volumes and Areas among Women Undergoing Diagnostic Image-Guided Breast Biopsy. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention. 23(11). 2338–2348. 15 indexed citations

Carney, Patricia A., Berta M. Geller, Karla Kerlikowske, et al.. (2012). Association Between Time Spent Interpreting, Level of Confidence, and Accuracy of Screening Mammography. American Journal of Roentgenology. 198(4). 970–978. 19 indexed citations

Hofvind, Solveig, et al.. (2012). Sensitivity and specificity of mammographic screening as practised in Vermont and Norway. British Journal of Radiology. 85(1020). e1226–e1232. 39 indexed citations

Elmore, Joann G., Pamela Ganschow, & Berta M. Geller. (2010). Communication Between Patients and Providers and Informed Decision Making. JNCI Monographs. 2010(41). 204–209. 20 indexed citations

Yankaskas, Bonnie C., Sebastien Haneuse, Julie M. Kapp, et al.. (2010). Response: Re: Performance of First Mammography Examination in Women Younger Than 40 Years. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 102(22). 1742–1742. 8 indexed citations

Carney, Patricia A., Berta M. Geller, Edward A. Sickles, et al.. (2010). Feasibility and Satisfaction with a Tailored Web-based Audit Intervention for Recalibrating Radiologists’ Thresholds for Conducting Additional Work-up. Academic Radiology. 18(3). 369–376. 6 indexed citations

Hofvind, Solveig, Berta M. Geller, Robert Rosenberg, & Per Skaane. (2009). Screening-detected Breast Cancers: Discordant Independent Double Reading in a Population-based Screening Program. Radiology. 253(3). 652–660. 44 indexed citations

10.

Elmore, Joann G., Sara L. Jackson, Linn Abraham, et al.. (2009). Variability in Interpretive Performance at Screening Mammography and Radiologists’ Characteristics Associated with Accuracy. Radiology. 253(3). 641–651. 194 indexed citations

11.

Cronin, Kathleen A., Binbing Yu, Martin Krapcho, et al.. (2005). Modeling the dissemination of mammography in the United States. Cancer Causes & Control. 16(6). 701–712. 59 indexed citations

12.

Sickles, Edward A., Diana L. Miglioretti, Rachel Ballard‐Barbash, et al.. (2005). Performance Benchmarks for Diagnostic Mammography. Radiology. 235(3). 775–790. 161 indexed citations

13.

Geller, Berta M., Pamela M. Vacek, Joan M. Skelly, & Susan C. Harvey. (2005). The use of additional imaging increased specificity and decreased sensitivity in screening mammography. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 58(9). 942–950. 9 indexed citations

14.

Geller, Berta M., et al.. (2004). Patient perceptions of breast biopsy procedures for screen-detected lesions. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 190(4). 1063–1069. 12 indexed citations

15.

White, Emily, Diana L. Miglioretti, Bonnie C. Yankaskas, et al.. (2004). Biennial Versus Annual Mammography and the Risk of Late-Stage Breast Cancer. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 96(24). 1832–1839. 82 indexed citations

16.

Taplin, Stephen H., Laura Ichikawa, Karla Kerlikowske, et al.. (2002). Concordance of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Assessments and Management Recommendations in Screening Mammography. Radiology. 222(2). 529–535. 84 indexed citations

17.

Lam, Prudence, et al.. (2000). The association of increased weight, body mass index, and tissue density with the risk of breast carcinoma in Vermont. Cancer. 89(2). 369–375. 84 indexed citations

18.

Worden, John K., et al.. (1999). Community-Based Promotion of Breast Screening Using Small Group Education. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice. 5(3). 54–62. 6 indexed citations

19.

Ellis, Charles A., et al.. (1999). Life Expectancy Estimation with Breast Cancer: Bias of the Declining Exponential Function and an Alternative to Its Use. Medical Decision Making. 19(4). 385–393. 8 indexed citations

20.

Flynn, Brendan, John K. Worden, Roger H. Secker‐Walker, et al.. (1994). Mass media and school interventions for cigarette smoking prevention: effects 2 years after completion.. American Journal of Public Health. 84(7). 1148–1150. 157 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact