Philip Alford

30 total papers · 1.3k total citations
17 papers, 892 citations indexed

About

Philip Alford is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management and Marketing. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip Alford has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 892 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 5 papers in Strategy and Management and 4 papers in Marketing. Recurrent topics in Philip Alford's work include Digital Marketing and Social Media (8 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (4 papers) and Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (3 papers). Philip Alford is often cited by papers focused on Digital Marketing and Social Media (8 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (4 papers) and Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (3 papers). Philip Alford collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and Austria. Philip Alford's co-authors include Robert Eller, Mike Peters, Stephen J. Page, Yanqing Duan, Rosalind Jones, Zetian Fu, Steve Clarke, Tony Seaton, Rob Davidson and Ruth Ann Jones and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Business Research, Tourism Management and Technovation.

In The Last Decade

Philip Alford

17 papers receiving 826 citations

Hit Papers

Antecedents, consequences... 2020 2026 2022 2024 2020 100 200 300 400 500

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Philip Alford 285 285 167 159 155 17 892
Joseph K. Nwankpa 299 1.0× 254 0.9× 147 0.9× 234 1.5× 144 0.9× 29 1.0k
Yaman Roumani 203 0.7× 214 0.8× 116 0.7× 143 0.9× 114 0.7× 23 745
Michela Matarazzo 390 1.4× 220 0.8× 234 1.4× 75 0.5× 232 1.5× 29 923
Abbas Tarhini 227 0.8× 213 0.7× 203 1.2× 89 0.6× 235 1.5× 23 935
Khaled Saleh Al-Omoush 343 1.2× 175 0.6× 179 1.1× 131 0.8× 140 0.9× 34 837
Volker Bilgram 173 0.6× 255 0.9× 111 0.7× 87 0.5× 190 1.2× 21 958
Alberto Michele Felicetti 260 0.9× 271 1.0× 107 0.6× 76 0.5× 141 0.9× 46 869
Carsten Lund Pedersen 380 1.3× 200 0.7× 254 1.5× 61 0.4× 221 1.4× 26 898
Alice Mazzucchelli 464 1.6× 201 0.7× 105 0.6× 94 0.6× 337 2.2× 31 1.0k
Georgia Sakka 308 1.1× 241 0.8× 106 0.6× 115 0.7× 221 1.4× 43 890

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Alford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Alford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Alford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Alford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Alford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Alford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Alford. The network helps show where Philip Alford may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Alford

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Alford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Alford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Alford. Philip Alford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026