Philip Alderson
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty top 1%
- Surgery
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Co-authors
- Andrew D OxmanJan BrożekHolger J. SchünemannYngve Falck–YtterDavid AtkinsPaul GlasziouGunn Elisabeth VistRegina Kunz
- Topics
- Clinical practice guidelines implementation (6 papers)Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (3 papers)Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Statistics, Probability and UncertaintyPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational HealthGeneral Health Professions
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Philip Alderson
9 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 150
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 444
- General Health Professions 309
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 292
- Surgery 270
- Economics and Econometrics 260
Countries citing papers authored by Philip Alderson
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Alderson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Alderson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Alderson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Alderson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Alderson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Alderson. The network helps show where Philip Alderson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Alderson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Alderson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Alderson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Alderson. Philip Alderson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 19 | |
| 2 | 140 | |
| 3 | 19 | |
| 4 | 45 | |
| 5 | GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomesbreakdown → | 1266 |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 210 | |
| 9 | 9 |
About Philip Alderson
Philip Alderson is a scholar working on Medical Terminology, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 9 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Clinical practice guidelines implementation (6 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (3 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (292 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (444 citations) and General Health Professions (309 citations). Philip Alderson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Andrew D Oxman, Jan Brożek, Holger J. Schünemann, Yngve Falck–Ytter, David Atkins, Paul Glasziou, Gunn Elisabeth Vist, Regina Kunz, Gordon Guyatt and Elizabeth Wager. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, The British Journal of Psychiatry and Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.