Rosalind Lai

1.6k total citations · 1 hit paper
6 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Rosalind Lai is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Infectious Diseases. According to data from OpenAlex, Rosalind Lai has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in General Health Professions, 2 papers in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and 1 paper in Infectious Diseases. Recurrent topics in Rosalind Lai's work include Clinical practice guidelines implementation (1 paper), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (1 paper) and Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper). Rosalind Lai is often cited by papers focused on Clinical practice guidelines implementation (1 paper), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (1 paper) and Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper). Rosalind Lai collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand. Rosalind Lai's co-authors include Joanne Burns, Sharon See Tai, Elizabeth Murray, Irwin Nazareth, Craig Ritchie, Robert Blizard, Peter Raven, Tim Clayton, David Ames and J. A. Roberts and has published in prestigious journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology and The Lancet Infectious Diseases.

In The Last Decade

Rosalind Lai

6 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Interactive Health Communication Applications for people with chronic disease

2005 574 citations Elizabeth Murray, Joanne Burns et al. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews profile →

Peers

Rosalind Lai

GHP

CCICM

APM

EPIDE

ID

Mary M. Doyle‐Waters Canada

Mahlagha Dehghan Iran

Alison E. Turnbull United States

Leanne Hunt Australia

Joana Berger‐Estilita Switzerland

Päivi Kankkunen Finland

Janet C. Mentes United States

Cheryl A Sadowski Canada

Gráinne Cousins Ireland

Donald L. Uden United States

Mary M. Doyle‐Waters Canada

Rosalind Lai

308 ×0.8

GHP

78 ×0.3

CCICM

171 ×1.3

APM

162 ×1.2

EPIDE

27 ×0.2

ID

Citations per year, relative to Rosalind Lai Rosalind Lai (= 1×) peers Mary M. Doyle‐Waters

Countries citing papers authored by Rosalind Lai

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rosalind Lai's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rosalind Lai with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rosalind Lai more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rosalind Lai

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rosalind Lai. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rosalind Lai. The network helps show where Rosalind Lai may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rosalind Lai

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rosalind Lai. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rosalind Lai based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rosalind Lai. Rosalind Lai is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

6 of 6 papers shown

1.

Stockton, Sarah, et al.. (2013). Searching CINAHL did not add value to clinical questions posed in NICE guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 66(9). 1051–1057. 19 indexed citations

2.

McGuire, Hugh, et al.. (2012). Clofibrate in combination with phototherapy for unconjugated neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2019(3). CD009017–CD009017. 11 indexed citations

3.

Stone, Sheldon P., Ben S. Cooper, C Kibbler, et al.. (2007). The ORION statement: guidelines for transparent reporting of outbreak reports and intervention studies of nosocomial infection. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 7(4). 282–288. 234 indexed citations

4.

Ritchie, Craig, et al.. (2006). The incidence of delirium associated with orthopedic surgery: a meta-analytic review. International Psychogeriatrics. 19(2). 197–214. 258 indexed citations

5.

Murray, Elizabeth, Joanne Burns, Sharon See Tai, Rosalind Lai, & Irwin Nazareth. (2005). Interactive Health Communication Applications for people with chronic disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. CD004274–CD004274. 574 indexed citations breakdown →

6.

Ritchie, Craig, David Ames, Tim Clayton, & Rosalind Lai. (2004). Metaanalysis of Randomized Trials of the Efficacy and Safety of Donepezil, Galantamine, and Rivastigmine for the Treatment of Alzheimer Disease. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 12(4). 358–369. 94 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact