Sarah Rosenbaum
About
Sarah Rosenbaum is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.
According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah Rosenbaum has authored 60 papers receiving a total of 2.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 40 papers in General Health Professions, 14 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 12 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Sarah Rosenbaum's work include Health Policy Implementation Science (24 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (13 papers) and Health Sciences Research and Education (11 papers). Sarah Rosenbaum is often cited by papers focused on Health Policy Implementation Science (24 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (13 papers) and Health Sciences Research and Education (11 papers). Sarah Rosenbaum collaborates with scholars based in Norway, Uganda and South Africa. Sarah Rosenbaum's co-authors include Andrew D Oxman, Claire Glenton, Angela Morelli, Holger J. Schünemann, Pablo Alonso‐Coello, Jenny Moberg, Gabriel Rada, Gordon Guyatt, Shaun Treweek and Marina Davoli and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.
In The Last Decade
Sarah Rosenbaum
56 papers receiving 2.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Sarah Rosenbaum
Janet Harris United Kingdom
Hilda Bastian Germany
Loai Albarqouni Australia
Erin Ueffing Canada
Julie Polisena Canada
Melissa Carlson United States
Alain Mayhew Canada
Tomás Pantoja Chile
Gabriel Rada Chile
Hugh H. Tilson United States
Citations per year, relative to Sarah Rosenbaum Sarah Rosenbaum (= 1×)
peers
Janet Harris
Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Rosenbaum
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Rosenbaum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Rosenbaum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Rosenbaum more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Rosenbaum
Since
Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Rosenbaum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Rosenbaum. The network helps show where Sarah Rosenbaum may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Rosenbaum
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Rosenbaum. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Rosenbaum based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Rosenbaum. Sarah Rosenbaum is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
1.
Oxman, Matt, Michael Mugisha, Ronald Ssenyonga, et al.. (2025). Participants’ experiences of potential adverse effects of an intervention to improve critical thinking about health choices: a qualitative cross-trial process evaluation in Kenya, Rwanda and Uganda. BMJ Open. 15(10). e104236–e104236.
2.
Oxman, Andrew D, Margaret Kaseje, Michael Mugisha, et al.. (2024). Process Evaluation of Teaching Critical Thinking About Health Using the Informed Health Choices Intervention in Kenya: A Mixed Methods Study. Global Health Science and Practice. 12(6). e2300485–e2300485.
3.
Ssenyonga, Ronald, Simon Lewin, Michael Mugisha, et al.. (2024). Process Evaluation of Teaching Critical Thinking About Health Using the Informed Health Choices Intervention in Uganda: A Mixed Methods Study. Global Health Science and Practice. 12(6). e2300484–e2300484.
4.
Mugisha, Michael, Ronald Ssenyonga, Christopher James Rose, et al.. (2023). Effects of the Informed Health Choices secondary school intervention: A prospective meta‐analysis. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine. 16(3). 321–331.
5.
Mugisha, Michael, Laetitia Nyirazinyoye, Matt Oxman, et al.. (2023). Effects of the Informed Health Choices secondary school intervention on the ability of students in Rwanda to think critically about health choices: A cluster‐randomized trial. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine. 16(3). 264–274.
6.
Kaseje, Margaret, Michael Mugisha, Ronald Ssenyonga, et al.. (2023). Effects of the informed health choices secondary school intervention on the ability of students in Kenya to think critically about health choices: A cluster‐randomized trial. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine. 16(3). 275–284.
7.
Alonso‐Coello, Pablo, Ena Niño de Guzmán, Giordano Pérez‐Gaxiola, et al.. (2023). Piloting the informed health choices resources in Barcelona primary schools: A mixed methods study. PLoS ONE. 18(7). e0288082–e0288082.
8.
Munthe‐Kaas, Heather Menzies, et al.. (2022). User experiences of structured stakeholder engagement to consider transferability: The TRANSFER approach. Campbell Systematic Reviews. 18(4). e1284–e1284.
9.
Ssenyonga, Ronald, Nelson K. Sewankambo, Michael Mugisha, et al.. (2022). Learning to think critically about health using digital technology in Ugandan lower secondary schools: A contextual analysis. PLoS ONE. 17(2). e0260367–e0260367.
10.
Oxman, Andrew D, Claire Glenton, Signe Flottorp, et al.. (2020). Development of a checklist for people communicating evidence-based information about the effects of healthcare interventions: a mixed methods study. BMJ Open. 10(7). e036348–e036348.
11.
Nsangi, Allen, Andrew D Oxman, Matt Oxman, et al.. (2020). Protocol for assessing stakeholder engagement in the development and evaluation of the Informed Health Choices resources teaching secondary school students to think critically about health claims and choices. PLoS ONE. 15(10). e0239985–e0239985.
12.
Semakula, Daniel, Allen Nsangi, Andrew D Oxman, et al.. (2019). Informed Health Choices media intervention for improving people’s ability to critically appraise the trustworthiness of claims about treatment effects: a mixed-methods process evaluation of a randomised trial in Uganda. BMJ Open. 9(12). e031510–e031510.
13.
Nsangi, Allen, Daniel Semakula, Claire Glenton, et al.. (2019). Informed health choices intervention to teach primary school children in low-income countries to assess claims about treatment effects: process evaluation. BMJ Open. 9(9). e030787–e030787.
14.
Lewin, Simon, Claire Glenton, Theresa A Lawrie, et al.. (2019). Qualitative Evidence Synthesis (QES) for Guidelines: Paper 2 – Using qualitative evidence synthesis findings to inform evidence-to-decision frameworks and recommendations. Health Research Policy and Systems. 17(1). 75–75.
15.
Downe, Soo, Kenneth Finlayson, Theresa A Lawrie, et al.. (2019). Qualitative Evidence Synthesis (QES) for Guidelines: Paper 1 – Using qualitative evidence synthesis to inform guideline scope and develop qualitative findings statements. Health Research Policy and Systems. 17(1). 76–76.
16.
Semakula, Daniel, Allen Nsangi, Matt Oxman, et al.. (2017). Can an educational podcast improve the ability of parents of primary school children to assess the reliability of claims made about the benefits and harms of treatments: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 18(1). 31–31.
17.
Dahlgren, Astrid, Daniel Semakula, Allen Nsangi, et al.. (2017). Measuring ability to assess claims about treatment effects: the development of the ‘Claim Evaluation Tools’. BMJ Open. 7(5). e013184–e013184.
18.
Semakula, Daniel, Allen Nsangi, Andrew D Oxman, et al.. (2017). Effects of the Informed Health Choices podcast on the ability of parents of primary school children in Uganda to assess claims about treatment effects: a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 390(10092). 389–398.
19.
Alonso‐Coello, Pablo, Holger J. Schünemann, Jenny Moberg, et al.. (2016). GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: Introduction. BMJ. 353. i2016–i2016.
20.
Rosenbaum, Sarah, et al.. (2010). User testing and stakeholder feedback contributed to the development of understandable and useful Summary of Findings tables for Cochrane reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 63(6). 607–619.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact
Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Janet Harris Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Hilda Bastian Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Loai Albarqouni Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Erin Ueffing Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Julie Polisena Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Melissa Carlson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Alain Mayhew Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Tomás Pantoja Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Gabriel Rada Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Hugh H. Tilson