Phebe Cramer

5.2k citations
108 papers · 3.4k indexed · h-index 32

Phebe Cramer

105 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Peers

Phebe Cramer
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
  • Clinical Psychology 2.2k
  • Applied Psychology 473
  • Social Psychology 1.0k
  • Pharmacy 243
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 581
Replace Ivan Mervielde with:
Ivan Mervielde Belgium
Bonnie R. Strickland United States
Arnaldo Zelli Italy
Carolin J. Showers United States
Tiffany Yip United States
Bernice L. Rosman United States
Monica J. Harris United States
Joel A. Gold United States
Theodore Millon United States
Diane Carlson Jones United States
Phebe Cramer relative to Ivan Mervielde Belgium Ivan Mervielde's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Ivan Mervielde · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Phebe Cramer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phebe Cramer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phebe Cramer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phebe Cramer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phebe Cramer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phebe Cramer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phebe Cramer. The network helps show where Phebe Cramer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Phebe Cramer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Phebe Cramer Line = papers co-authored together Phebe Cramer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20198
2 20183
3 20182
4 20176
5 201612
6 20168
7 20161
8 201576
9 20156
10 201474
11 201021
12 200417
13 200335
14 200328
15 200332
16 200128
17 19804
18 197822
19
Understanding intellectual development : three approaches to theory and practice
19744
20
Readings in developmental psychology today
197011

About Phebe Cramer

Phebe Cramer is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Applied Psychology, Social Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 108 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (25 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (24 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (23 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (21 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (12 papers), Psychological Testing and Assessment (9 papers), Identity, Memory, and Therapy (8 papers) and Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (2.2k citations), Applied Psychology (473 citations), Social Psychology (1.0k citations), Pharmacy (243 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (581 citations). Phebe Cramer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Sidney J. Blatt, Marlene J. Sandstrom, Richard Q. Ford, Stephen J. Dollinger, Constance J. Jones, Jack Block, Katherine Hogan, Allison J. Tracy, Morris N. Eagle and Gail M. Ferguson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality, Journal of Research in Personality, Journal of Personality Assessment, The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease and Developmental Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026