Peter W. New

119 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Peers

Peter W. New
Comparison fields: 5 of 136
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.7k
  • Rehabilitation 513
  • Emergency Medicine 508
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 514
  • Occupational Therapy 120
Replace Amitabh Jha with:
Amitabh Jha United States
Sander L. Hitzig Canada
William McKinley United States
Susan Charlifue United States
Martin Forchheimer United States
Bhasker Amatya Australia
Claire Z. Kalpakjian United States
Michelle A. Meade United States
Karen A. Hart United States
Erik Hendriks Netherlands
Peter W. New relative to Amitabh Jha United States Amitabh Jha's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Amitabh Jha · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter W. New

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter W. New's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter W. New with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter W. New more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter W. New

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter W. New. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter W. New. The network helps show where Peter W. New may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter W. New, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter W. New Line = papers co-authored together Peter W. New links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20231
2 20232
3 20224
4 202030
5 20193
6 20195
7 201943
8 201821
9
Comparing Compensatory and Restorative Approaches to Memory Rehabilitation Following Stroke: A Phase II Randomised Controlled Trial
20182
10
Intermittent catheter choice impacts quality of life: clinical study on safety and preference of single vs. reuse catheters
20181
11 20181
12 20179
13 201322
14 201333
15 201071
16 200924
17 200914
18 200865
19 200831
20 200520

About Peter W. New

Peter W. New is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Psychiatry and Mental health and Occupational Therapy, having authored 121 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spinal Cord Injury Research (67 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (25 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (23 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (15 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (15 papers), Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations (13 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (8 papers) and Traumatic Brain Injury Research (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.7k citations), Rehabilitation (513 citations), Emergency Medicine (508 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (514 citations) and Occupational Therapy (120 citations). Peter W. New has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Fin Biering‐Sørensen, Vijaya Sundararajan, Michael J. DeVivo, Ruth Marshall, Hyam Barry Rawicki, Michael Bailey, Marcel W. M. Post, Christine Migliorini, Farooq Azam Rathore and Vanessa K. Noonan. Their work appears in journals such as Spinal Cord, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation, The Medical Journal of Australia and Disability and Rehabilitation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026