Éimear Smith

1.1k total citations
35 papers, 707 citations indexed

About

Éimear Smith is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery and Emergency Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Éimear Smith has authored 35 papers receiving a total of 707 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine, 13 papers in Surgery and 8 papers in Emergency Medicine. Recurrent topics in Éimear Smith's work include Spinal Cord Injury Research (18 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (7 papers) and Trauma Management and Diagnosis (5 papers). Éimear Smith is often cited by papers focused on Spinal Cord Injury Research (18 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (7 papers) and Trauma Management and Diagnosis (5 papers). Éimear Smith collaborates with scholars based in Ireland, United States and Canada. Éimear Smith's co-authors include Mark Delargy, Catherine Comiskey, Áine Carroll, Andrea Townson, Giorgio Scivoletto, Inge Eriks‐Hoogland, Marcel W. M. Post, Peter W. New, Ronald K. Reeves and Anupam Gupta and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

In The Last Decade

Éimear Smith

33 papers receiving 678 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Éimear Smith Ireland 15 243 169 153 101 97 35 707
M H Fraser United Kingdom 9 351 1.4× 124 0.7× 100 0.7× 89 0.9× 107 1.1× 15 707
Mark Delargy Ireland 13 138 0.6× 71 0.4× 193 1.3× 217 2.1× 230 2.4× 31 815
Jocelyn L. Bowden Australia 19 270 1.1× 169 1.0× 103 0.7× 52 0.5× 237 2.4× 49 1.1k
Anthony Gélis France 17 199 0.8× 178 1.1× 74 0.5× 63 0.6× 102 1.1× 62 783
C. Payán France 20 156 0.6× 167 1.0× 41 0.3× 71 0.7× 240 2.5× 31 1.4k
Gregory Nemunaitis United States 14 380 1.6× 206 1.2× 66 0.4× 75 0.7× 75 0.8× 44 683
Colleen F. McGillivray Canada 14 677 2.8× 133 0.8× 65 0.4× 87 0.9× 345 3.6× 18 1.0k
Xin Gao China 17 144 0.6× 66 0.4× 326 2.1× 70 0.7× 109 1.1× 56 967
Mary Schmidt Read United States 8 474 2.0× 179 1.1× 71 0.5× 46 0.5× 209 2.2× 16 687
Jan T. Groothuis Netherlands 19 187 0.8× 445 2.6× 41 0.3× 40 0.4× 80 0.8× 73 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Éimear Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Éimear Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Éimear Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Éimear Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Éimear Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Éimear Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Éimear Smith. The network helps show where Éimear Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Éimear Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Éimear Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Éimear Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Éimear Smith. Éimear Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Dervan, Adrian, Ian Woods, John F. Quinlan, et al.. (2024). The role of Patient and public involvement (PPI) in pre-clinical spinal cord research: An interview study. PLoS ONE. 19(4). e0301626–e0301626. 2 indexed citations
3.
Smith, Éimear, Adrian Dervan, John F. Quinlan, et al.. (2024). Perspectives of researchers and clinicians on patient and public involvement (PPI) in preclinical spinal cord research: An interview study. Health Expectations. 27(1). e13967–e13967. 1 indexed citations
4.
Dervan, Adrian, Ian Woods, Paul Murphy, et al.. (2021). Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in preclinical research: A scoping review protocol. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4. 61–61.
5.
Dervan, Adrian, Ian Woods, Paul Murphy, et al.. (2021). Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in preclinical research: A scoping review protocol. HRB Open Research. 4. 61–61. 1 indexed citations
6.
7.
Smith, Éimear, Patricia Fitzpatrick, Frank Lyons, Seamus Morris, & Keith Synnott. (2019). Prospective epidemiological update on traumatic spinal cord injury in Ireland. Spinal Cord Series and Cases. 5(1). 9–9. 8 indexed citations
8.
Smith, Éimear. (2016). Proximal tibia fracture in a patient with incomplete spinal cord injury associated with robotic treadmill training. Spinal Cord Series and Cases. 2(1). 16010–16010. 1 indexed citations
9.
Smith, Éimear, Catherine Comiskey, & Áine Carroll. (2016). Prevalence of and risk factors for osteoporosis in adults with acquired brain injury. Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -). 185(2). 473–481. 22 indexed citations
10.
New, Peter W., Ronald K. Reeves, Éimear Smith, et al.. (2015). International Retrospective Comparison of Inpatient Rehabilitation for Patients With Spinal Cord Dysfunction Epidemiology and Clinical Outcomes. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 96(6). 1080–1087. 37 indexed citations
11.
New, Peter W., Ronald K. Reeves, Éimear Smith, et al.. (2015). International Retrospective Comparison of Inpatient Rehabilitation for Patients With Spinal Cord Dysfunction: Differences According to Etiology. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 97(3). 380–385. 31 indexed citations
12.
Wong, Samford, Maurizio Belci, Ilse J. W. van Nes, et al.. (2014). Knowledge, attitudes and practices of medical staff towards obesity management in patients with spinal cord injuries: an International survey of four western European countries. Spinal Cord. 53(1). 24–31. 6 indexed citations
13.
New, Peter W., Giorgio Scivoletto, Éimear Smith, et al.. (2013). International survey of perceived barriers to admission and discharge from spinal cord injury rehabilitation units. Spinal Cord. 51(12). 893–897. 22 indexed citations
14.
Bruce-Brand, Robert, Gabrielle Colleran, James Broderick, et al.. (2013). Acute Nontraumatic Spinal Intradural Hematoma in a Patient on Warfarin. Journal of Emergency Medicine. 45(5). 695–697. 31 indexed citations
15.
New, Peter W., Andrea Townson, Giorgio Scivoletto, et al.. (2012). International comparison of the organisation of rehabilitation services and systems of care for patients with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 51(1). 33–39. 40 indexed citations
16.
Smith, Éimear & Áine Carroll. (2011). Bone Mineral Density in Adults Disabled Through Acquired Neurological Conditions: A Review. Journal of Clinical Densitometry. 14(2). 85–94. 13 indexed citations
17.
Smith, Éimear. (2011). Treatments for Osteoporosis in People With a Disability. PM&R. 3(2). 143–152. 7 indexed citations
18.
Smith, Éimear, et al.. (2009). Residual limb osteomyelitis: A case series from a national prosthetic centre. Disability and Rehabilitation. 31(21). 1785–1789. 1 indexed citations
19.
Smith, Éimear, et al.. (2007). Prevalence and patterns of back pain and residual limb pain in lower limb amputees at the National Rehabilitation Hospital. Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -). 177(1). 53–57. 19 indexed citations
20.
Smith, Éimear & Mark Delargy. (2005). Locked-in syndrome. BMJ. 330(7488). 406–409. 262 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026