Amitabh Jha
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 0.2%
- Surgery top 5%
- Epidemiology top 5%
- Rehabilitation top 0.5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Co-authors
- Steven KirshblumLinda JonesStephen P. BurnsWilliam WaringM.J. MulcaheyFin Biering‐SørensenWilliam H. DonovanDaniel Graves
- Topics
- Spinal Cord Injury Research (14 papers)Traumatic Brain Injury Research (9 papers)Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaDenmark
In The Last Decade
Amitabh Jha
30 papers receiving 3.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 2.3k
- Surgery 1.1k
- Epidemiology 757
- Rehabilitation 713
- Psychiatry and Mental health 702
Countries citing papers authored by Amitabh Jha
This map shows the geographic impact of Amitabh Jha's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amitabh Jha with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amitabh Jha more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amitabh Jha
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amitabh Jha. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amitabh Jha. The network helps show where Amitabh Jha may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amitabh Jha
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amitabh Jha. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amitabh Jha based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amitabh Jha. Amitabh Jha is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 35 | |
| 2 | 24 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 32 | |
| 5 | 19 | |
| 6 | 106 | |
| 7 | 27 | |
| 8 | Reference for the 2011 revision of the international standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injurybreakdown → | 449 |
| 9 | International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (Revised 2011)breakdown → | 1797 |
| 10 | 62 | |
| 11 | 178 | |
| 12 | 82 | |
| 13 | 125 | |
| 14 | 113 | |
| 15 | 51 | |
| 16 | 42 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 52 | |
| 19 | 102 | |
| 20 | 153 |
About Amitabh Jha
Amitabh Jha is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Emergency Medicine and Urology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 4.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spinal Cord Injury Research (14 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (9 papers) and Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (2.3k citations), Rehabilitation (713 citations) and Emergency Medicine (644 citations). Amitabh Jha has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Steven Kirshblum, Linda Jones, Stephen P. Burns, William Waring, M.J. Mulcahey, Fin Biering‐Sørensen, William H. Donovan, Daniel Graves, Mary Schmidt-Read and Andrei V. Krassioukov. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Urology, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Spinal Cord.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.