Denise G. Tate
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 0.2%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 1%
- Epidemiology top 5%
- Rehabilitation top 0.2%
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Martin ForchheimerCharles H. BombardierClaire Z. KalpakjianMarcel DijkersMichelle A. MeadeDavid S. TulskyGale G. WhiteneckJesse R. Fann
- Topics
- Spinal Cord Injury Research (89 papers)Traumatic Brain Injury Research (37 papers)Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (32 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaAmerican PsychologistSocial Science & Medicine
- Partner nations
- United StatesBrazilNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Denise G. Tate
161 papers receiving 4.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 139
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 2.7k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 1.3k
- Epidemiology 973
- Rehabilitation 890
- Clinical Psychology 848
Countries citing papers authored by Denise G. Tate
This map shows the geographic impact of Denise G. Tate's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Denise G. Tate with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Denise G. Tate more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Denise G. Tate
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Denise G. Tate. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Denise G. Tate. The network helps show where Denise G. Tate may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Denise G. Tate
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Denise G. Tate. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Denise G. Tate based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Denise G. Tate. Denise G. Tate is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 54 | |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | Pain severity and mobility one year after spinal cord injury: a multicenter, cross-sectional study. | 11 |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 36 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 60 | |
| 13 | 113 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 20 | |
| 17 | 273 | |
| 18 | 72 | |
| 19 | 62 | |
| 20 | Evaluation of a Medical Rehabilitation and Independent Living Program for Persons with Spinal Cord Injury | 7 |
About Denise G. Tate
Denise G. Tate is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Occupational Therapy and Rehabilitation, having authored 164 papers that have together received 5.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spinal Cord Injury Research (89 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (37 papers) and Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (32 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (2.7k citations), Rehabilitation (890 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (1.3k citations). Denise G. Tate has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Martin Forchheimer, Charles H. Bombardier, Claire Z. Kalpakjian, Marcel Dijkers, Michelle A. Meade, David S. Tulsky, Gale G. Whiteneck, Jesse R. Fann, Eric D. Zemper and William M. Scelza. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, American Psychologist and Social Science & Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.