Denise G. Tate

6.5k citations
164 papers · 5.0k indexed · h-index 39

Denise G. Tate

161 papers receiving 4.8k citations

Peers

Denise G. Tate
Comparison fields: 5 of 139
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 2.7k
  • Rehabilitation 890
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 1.3k
  • Occupational Therapy 359
  • Health 406
Replace Susan Charlifue with:
Susan Charlifue United States
Martin Forchheimer United States
Luc Noreau Canada
James S. Krause United States
B. Catharine Craven Canada
Vanessa K. Noonan Canada
Lawrence C. Vogel United States
Gale G. Whiteneck United States
Rita Bode United States
Diana H. Rintala United States
Denise G. Tate relative to Susan Charlifue United States Susan Charlifue's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Susan Charlifue · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Denise G. Tate

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Denise G. Tate's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Denise G. Tate with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Denise G. Tate more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Denise G. Tate

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Denise G. Tate. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Denise G. Tate. The network helps show where Denise G. Tate may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Denise G. Tate, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Denise G. Tate Line = papers co-authored together Denise G. Tate links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20241
2 20232
3 20231
4 20214
5 202054
6 201713
7
Pain severity and mobility one year after spinal cord injury: a multicenter, cross-sectional study.
201611
8 20155
9 201536
10 20146
11 201312
12 201260
13 2011113
14 20069
15 20066
16 200520
17 2004273
18 200372
19 200362
20
Evaluation of a Medical Rehabilitation and Independent Living Program for Persons with Spinal Cord Injury
19927

About Denise G. Tate

Denise G. Tate is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Occupational Therapy and Rehabilitation, having authored 164 papers that have together received 5.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spinal Cord Injury Research (89 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (37 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (32 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (18 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (17 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (17 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (11 papers) and Delphi Technique in Research (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (2.7k citations), Rehabilitation (890 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (1.3k citations). Denise G. Tate has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Martin Forchheimer, Charles H. Bombardier, Claire Z. Kalpakjian, Marcel Dijkers, Michelle A. Meade, David S. Tulsky, Gale G. Whiteneck, Jesse R. Fann, Eric D. Zemper and William M. Scelza. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, American Psychologist and Social Science & Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026