Peter Thomas

44 papers receiving 875 citations

Peers

Peter Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 75
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 245
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 48
  • Emergency Medical Services 55
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 14
Replace Koichiro Yoshida with:
Koichiro Yoshida Japan
Florian Prüller Austria
D K Mason United Kingdom
Pinaki Biswas United States
Claire R. Sharp United States
Brian R. Swenson United States
N. Bari Olivier United States
Paul McNamara United Kingdom
Alireza Abdollahi Iran
Henrik Nielsen Denmark
Peter Thomas relative to Koichiro Yoshida Japan Koichiro Yoshida's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Koichiro Yoshida · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Thomas. The network helps show where Peter Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Peter Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006234
2 200672
3 200465
4 198259
5 199453
6 199251
7 200645
8 200739
9 199337
10 197429
11 200926
12 199921
13 199820
14 198918
15 200018
16 200317
17 199215
18 200912
19 199210
20 199810

About Peter Thomas

Peter Thomas is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Mechanical Engineering, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 46 papers that have together received 926 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques (4 papers), Advanced machining processes and optimization (3 papers), Image and Object Detection Techniques (3 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (2 papers), Medical Imaging and Pathology Studies (2 papers), Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection (2 papers), Sensor Technology and Measurement Systems (2 papers) and Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (75 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (245 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (48 citations), Emergency Medical Services (55 citations) and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (14 citations). Peter Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include John G. Lewis, J. T. Ho, David J. Torpy, M. John Chapman, C.J. Bagley, T. Quach, Claire M. Rickard, Tim Williams, John H. Stewart and Jeffrey Lipman. Their work appears in journals such as Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, The Medical Journal of Australia, CHEST Journal, Machine Vision and Applications and The American Journal of Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact