Peter Stroh

603 total citations
20 papers, 425 citations indexed

About

Peter Stroh is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter Stroh has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 425 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 7 papers in Ecology and 5 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in Peter Stroh's work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (10 papers), Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (5 papers) and Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (4 papers). Peter Stroh is often cited by papers focused on Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (10 papers), Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (5 papers) and Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (4 papers). Peter Stroh collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Poland and Kenya. Peter Stroh's co-authors include Francine M. R. Hughes, J. O. Mountford, William M. Adams, Kevin J. Walker, Tim H. Sparks, Stuart Warrington, K. J. Kirby, Christopher Preston, Tom August and Michael F. Fay and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Ecological Indicators and Plant Ecology.

In The Last Decade

Peter Stroh

18 papers receiving 399 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Peter Stroh United Kingdom 9 185 184 144 105 92 20 425
Emma Ladouceur Germany 16 316 1.7× 232 1.3× 160 1.1× 154 1.5× 146 1.6× 30 586
Lauren S. Urgenson United States 14 239 1.3× 165 0.9× 258 1.8× 134 1.3× 113 1.2× 19 593
Rocco Labadessa Italy 10 171 0.9× 171 0.9× 156 1.1× 72 0.7× 93 1.0× 27 360
Violeta Hevia Spain 12 129 0.7× 113 0.6× 107 0.7× 90 0.9× 173 1.9× 27 420
Nicole L. Kinlock United States 10 242 1.3× 171 0.9× 141 1.0× 118 1.1× 199 2.2× 17 548
Uwe Riecken Germany 10 146 0.8× 156 0.8× 121 0.8× 58 0.6× 71 0.8× 23 382
Christoph Moning Germany 10 195 1.1× 175 1.0× 200 1.4× 157 1.5× 176 1.9× 16 566
Sarah K. Carter United States 13 201 1.1× 291 1.6× 236 1.6× 84 0.8× 127 1.4× 41 579
Timo Conradi Germany 14 248 1.3× 211 1.1× 265 1.8× 86 0.8× 105 1.1× 28 552
Anna Maria Fosaa Faroe Islands 10 207 1.1× 159 0.9× 128 0.9× 108 1.0× 108 1.2× 15 506

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Stroh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Stroh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Stroh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Stroh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Stroh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Stroh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Stroh. The network helps show where Peter Stroh may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Stroh

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Stroh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Stroh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Stroh. Peter Stroh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Stroh, Peter, Oliver L. Pescott, Richard M. Bateman, et al.. (2025). A new vascular plant Red List for Great Britain. NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council). 7(3).
2.
Stroh, Peter, Peter Carey, J. O. Mountford, et al.. (2022). effects of extensive grazing on the vegetation of a landscape-scale restoration site. NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council). 7(2). 8 indexed citations
3.
Pescott, Oliver L., et al.. (2022). Simple methods for improving the communication of uncertainty in species’ temporal trends. Ecological Indicators. 141. 109117–109117. 7 indexed citations
4.
Rumsey, Fred & Peter Stroh. (2020). Will de-extinction be forever? Lessons from the re-introductions of Bromus interruptus (Hack.) Druce. Journal for Nature Conservation. 56. 125835–125835. 3 indexed citations
5.
Walker, Kevin J. & Peter Stroh. (2020). Changes in the distribution and abundance of Carex ericetorum in Britain since the 1970s. 2(2). 1 indexed citations
6.
Pescott, Oliver L., et al.. (2019). Temporal changes in distributions and the species atlas: How can British and Irish plant data shoulder the inferential burden?. NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council). 1(4). 250–282. 15 indexed citations
7.
8.
Stroh, Peter, et al.. (2017). Long-term changes in lowland calcareous grassland plots using Tephroseris integrifolia subsp. integrifolia as an indicator species. Plant Ecology. 218(11-12). 1269–1281. 8 indexed citations
9.
Stroh, Peter, et al.. (2017). Angelica archangelica subsp. littoralis (Apiaceae) – a new native taxon for Britain. New Journal of Botany. 7(1). 57–58. 2 indexed citations
10.
Burns, Fiona, Mark A. Eaton, Kate E. Barlow, et al.. (2016). Agricultural Management and Climatic Change Are the Major Drivers of Biodiversity Change in the UK. PLoS ONE. 11(3). e0151595–e0151595. 73 indexed citations
11.
Stroh, Peter, Tom August, Kevin J. Walker, et al.. (2014). A vascular plant red list for England. 66 indexed citations
12.
Peh, Kelvin S.‐H., Andrew Balmford, Rob H. Field, et al.. (2014). Benefits and costs of ecological restoration: Rapid assessment of changing ecosystem service values at a U.K. wetland. Ecology and Evolution. 4(20). 3875–3886. 53 indexed citations
13.
Stroh, Peter, J. O. Mountford, Yoseph Araya, & Francine M. R. Hughes. (2013). Quantifying Soil Hydrology to Explain the Development of Vegetation at an Ex-Arable Wetland Restoration Site. Wetlands. 33(2). 311–320. 7 indexed citations
14.
Morrison, Ross, Peter Stroh, Susan Page, et al.. (2012). Net Ecosystem Carbon Dioxide Exchange at Semi-Natural and Regenerating Temperate Fens. Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester). 1 indexed citations
15.
Hughes, Francine M. R., William M. Adams, & Peter Stroh. (2012). When is Open‐endedness Desirable in Restoration Projects?. Restoration Ecology. 20(3). 291–295. 39 indexed citations
16.
Hughes, Francine M. R., Peter Stroh, William M. Adams, et al.. (2011). Monitoring and evaluating large-scale, ‘open-ended’ habitat creation projects: A journey rather than a destination. Journal for Nature Conservation. 19(4). 245–253. 57 indexed citations
17.
Stroh, Peter, J. O. Mountford, & Francine M. R. Hughes. (2011). The potential for endozoochorous dispersal of temperate fen plant species by free‐roaming horses. Applied Vegetation Science. 15(3). 359–368. 19 indexed citations
18.
Stroh, Peter, Francine M. R. Hughes, Tim H. Sparks, & J. O. Mountford. (2010). The Influence of Time on the Soil Seed Bank and Vegetation across a Landscape‐Scale Wetland Restoration Project. Restoration Ecology. 20(1). 103–112. 53 indexed citations
19.
Hughes, Francine M. R., Peter Stroh, J. O. Mountford, et al.. (2008). Monitoring large-scale wetland restoration projects: Is there an end in sight?. NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council). 2 indexed citations
20.
Stroh, Peter. (1987). Purposeful consulting. Organizational Dynamics. 16(1). 49–67. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Emma Ladouceur Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Lauren S. Urgenson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rocco Labadessa Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Violeta Hevia Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Nicole L. Kinlock Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Uwe Riecken Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Christoph Moning Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sarah K. Carter Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Timo Conradi Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Anna Maria Fosaa
Rankless by CCL
2026