Mark Parsons

2.2k total citations
43 papers, 1.7k citations indexed

About

Mark Parsons is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Ecological Modeling. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Parsons has authored 43 papers receiving a total of 1.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 19 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 14 papers in Ecological Modeling. Recurrent topics in Mark Parsons's work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (24 papers), Plant and animal studies (17 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (14 papers). Mark Parsons is often cited by papers focused on Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (24 papers), Plant and animal studies (17 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (14 papers). Mark Parsons collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Mark Parsons's co-authors include Richard Fox, I. P. Woiwod, K. F. Conrad, M. S. Warren, Nigel A. D. Bourn, Ruth E. Feber, Thomas Merckx, David W. Macdonald, Philip Riordan and M. C. Townsend and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Ecology and Science Advances.

In The Last Decade

Mark Parsons

40 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark Parsons United Kingdom 19 877 812 633 509 419 43 1.7k
Thomas Merckx Belgium 28 1.2k 1.4× 1.2k 1.4× 784 1.2× 718 1.4× 450 1.1× 50 2.2k
Janne Heliölä Finland 17 928 1.1× 1.1k 1.4× 941 1.5× 665 1.3× 404 1.0× 30 1.9k
Nigel A. D. Bourn United Kingdom 19 947 1.1× 1.1k 1.4× 611 1.0× 564 1.1× 270 0.6× 39 1.7k
Gustavo H. Kattan Colombia 25 672 0.8× 914 1.1× 579 0.9× 1.1k 2.1× 407 1.0× 81 2.0k
Brigitte Braschler Switzerland 18 615 0.7× 540 0.7× 532 0.8× 458 0.9× 216 0.5× 33 1.3k
Kimmo Saarinen Finland 20 772 0.9× 772 1.0× 559 0.9× 363 0.7× 154 0.4× 40 1.4k
Daijiang Li United States 21 668 0.8× 838 1.0× 512 0.8× 629 1.2× 354 0.8× 57 1.6k
K. F. Conrad United Kingdom 22 868 1.0× 694 0.9× 559 0.9× 774 1.5× 265 0.6× 37 1.7k
Gary D. Powney United Kingdom 21 958 1.1× 554 0.7× 728 1.2× 526 1.0× 338 0.8× 38 1.7k
Jiří Beneš Czechia 24 813 0.9× 1.0k 1.3× 600 0.9× 514 1.0× 295 0.7× 53 1.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Parsons

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Parsons's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Parsons with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Parsons more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Parsons

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Parsons. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Parsons. The network helps show where Mark Parsons may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Parsons

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Parsons. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Parsons based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Parsons. Mark Parsons is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Tordoff, George M., Mark Parsons, Emily B. Dennis, et al.. (2022). Traits data for the butterflies and macro‐moths of Great Britain and Ireland. Ecology. 103(5). e3670–e3670. 13 indexed citations
2.
Boyes, Douglas, Darren M. Evans, Richard Fox, Mark Parsons, & Michael J. O. Pocock. (2020). Is light pollution driving moth population declines? A review of causal mechanisms across the life cycle. Insect Conservation and Diversity. 14(2). 167–187. 110 indexed citations
3.
Jackson, Stephen, et al.. (2019). Landscape management of the mahogany glider (Petaurus gracilis) across its distribution: subpopulations and corridor priorities. Australian Mammalogy. 42(2). 152–159. 8 indexed citations
4.
Burns, Fiona, Mark A. Eaton, Kate E. Barlow, et al.. (2016). Agricultural Management and Climatic Change Are the Major Drivers of Biodiversity Change in the UK. PLoS ONE. 11(3). e0151595–e0151595. 73 indexed citations
5.
Baker, D. James, Colin M. Beale, Sam Ellis, et al.. (2016). Decline of a Rare Moth at Its Last Known English Site: Causes and Lessons for Conservation. PLoS ONE. 11(6). e0157423–e0157423. 1 indexed citations
6.
7.
Fox, Richard, Tom H. Oliver, Colin Harrower, et al.. (2014). Long‐term changes to the frequency of occurrence of British moths are consistent with opposing and synergistic effects of climate and land‐use changes. Journal of Applied Ecology. 51(4). 949–957. 175 indexed citations
8.
Parsons, Mark. (2012). A Complete History of the Butterflies and Moths of Sussex. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 166(1). 222–223.
9.
Broome, Alice, Susan Clarke, Andrew Peace, & Mark Parsons. (2011). The effect of coppice management on moth assemblages in an English woodland. Biodiversity and Conservation. 20(4). 729–749. 42 indexed citations
10.
Merckx, Thomas, Ruth E. Feber, Mark Parsons, et al.. (2010). Habitat preference and mobility of Polia bombycina: are non-tailored agri-environment schemes any good for a rare and localised species?. Journal of Insect Conservation. 14(5). 499–510. 25 indexed citations
11.
Landon, Stuart, et al.. (2006). Does Health-Care Spending Crowd out Other Provincial Government Expenditures?. Canadian Public Policy. 32(2). 121–121. 18 indexed citations
12.
Parsons, Mark. (2006). The value of sweet chestnut Castanea sativa as a foodplant for Lepidoptera. Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution). 2 indexed citations
13.
Conrad, K. F., M. S. Warren, Richard Fox, Mark Parsons, & I. P. Woiwod. (2006). Rapid declines of common, widespread British moths provide evidence of an insect biodiversity crisis. Biological Conservation. 132(3). 279–291. 369 indexed citations
14.
Williams, Paul R., et al.. (2005). Post-fire Plant Regeneration in Montane Heath of the Wet Tropics, North-Eastern Queensland. ResearchOnline at James Cook University (James Cook University). 112. 63. 3 indexed citations
15.
Nolan, G, et al.. (2005). Eucalypt Plantations for Solid Wood Products in Australia - A Review‘If you don’t prune it, we can’t use it’. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 25 indexed citations
16.
Schirmer, Jacki, et al.. (2005). Socio-economic impacts of plantation forestry in the Great Southern Region of WA, 1991 to 2004. 10 indexed citations
17.
Parsons, Mark. (2004). The United Kingdom Biodiversity Action Plan moths – selection, status and progress on conservation. Journal of Insect Conservation. 8(2-3). 95–107. 5 indexed citations
19.
Parsons, Mark. (2001). The European status of the UK biodiversity action plan moths. Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution). 5 indexed citations
20.
Parsons, Mark. (1984). Life histories of Taenaris (Nymphalidae) from Papua New Guinea.. Journal of The Lepidopterists Society. 38(2). 69–84. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026