Ecological Indicators

13.0k papers and 374.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 13.0k papers published in Ecological Indicators in the last decades have received a total of 374.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Ecological Indicators usually cover Global and Planetary Change (5.5k papers), Ecology (5.4k papers) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (2.6k papers) specifically the topics of Land Use and Ecosystem Services (3.1k papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (1.5k papers) and Fish Ecology and Management Studies (909 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Ecological Indicators are İlhan Öztürk, Nicole Kemper, Dagmar Haase, Benjamin Burkhard, Felix Müller, João Carlos Marques, Ángel Borja, Peter H. Verburg, Saurabh Kumar Gupta and Anil Kumar Dikshit.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Ecological Indicators

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Ecological Indicators. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Ecological Indicators.

Countries where authors publish in Ecological Indicators

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Ecological Indicators. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Ecological Indicators with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ecological Indicators more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025