Rob H. Field

1.7k total citations
36 papers, 788 citations indexed

About

Rob H. Field is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Global and Planetary Change. According to data from OpenAlex, Rob H. Field has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 788 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in Ecology, 13 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 13 papers in Global and Planetary Change. Recurrent topics in Rob H. Field's work include Avian ecology and behavior (13 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (10 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (10 papers). Rob H. Field is often cited by papers focused on Avian ecology and behavior (13 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (10 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (10 papers). Rob H. Field collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Poland and South Africa. Rob H. Field's co-authors include Richard B. Bradbury, David W. Gibbons, Matt R. Raven, J. H. Marchant, Richard D. Gregory, David G. Noble, Guy Q.A. Anderson, A. C. Taylor, Will J. Peach and Antony J. Morris and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Rob H. Field

35 papers receiving 727 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Rob H. Field United Kingdom 16 474 300 224 118 99 36 788
S.M. Bierman Netherlands 12 408 0.9× 169 0.6× 295 1.3× 180 1.5× 98 1.0× 17 800
Zhongwei Guo China 13 219 0.5× 562 1.9× 160 0.7× 118 1.0× 81 0.8× 21 859
Janelle M. R. Curtis Canada 18 629 1.3× 341 1.1× 434 1.9× 158 1.3× 92 0.9× 28 1.1k
Erin Graham Australia 12 565 1.2× 412 1.4× 238 1.1× 311 2.6× 126 1.3× 23 906
Pam Fuller United States 12 471 1.0× 189 0.6× 547 2.4× 140 1.2× 81 0.8× 23 851
Emmanuel A. Frimpong United States 24 954 2.0× 286 1.0× 983 4.4× 167 1.4× 88 0.9× 83 1.5k
Binduo Xu China 18 554 1.2× 736 2.5× 336 1.5× 152 1.3× 56 0.6× 119 1.1k
Paulo Pereira Portugal 16 271 0.6× 305 1.0× 127 0.6× 139 1.2× 112 1.1× 33 693
Julia Ramos Miranda Mexico 13 662 1.4× 579 1.9× 519 2.3× 94 0.8× 108 1.1× 39 1.2k
Jonathan M. Bossenbroek United States 17 912 1.9× 281 0.9× 611 2.7× 163 1.4× 96 1.0× 32 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Rob H. Field

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rob H. Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rob H. Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rob H. Field more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rob H. Field

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rob H. Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rob H. Field. The network helps show where Rob H. Field may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rob H. Field

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rob H. Field. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rob H. Field based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rob H. Field. Rob H. Field is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Waite, Catherine E., et al.. (2025). Solar farm management influences breeding bird responses in an arable-dominated landscape. Bird Study. 72(3). 217–222. 2 indexed citations
2.
Bradbury, Richard B., et al.. (2025). Randomised land use pathway generation allows efficient multi-outcome appraisal. Scientific Reports. 15(1). 18001–18001.
3.
Field, Rob H., et al.. (2024). Ambitious onshore renewable energy deployment does not exacerbate future UK land-use challenges. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1(8). 100122–100122. 2 indexed citations
4.
Finch, Tom, Richard B. Bradbury, Tom Bradfer‐Lawrence, et al.. (2023). Spatially targeted nature-based solutions can mitigate climate change and nature loss but require a systems approach. One Earth. 6(10). 1350–1374. 11 indexed citations
5.
Field, Rob H., et al.. (2021). Drivers of songbird territory density in the boundaries of a lowland arable farm. Acta Oecologica. 111. 103720–103720. 5 indexed citations
6.
Buchanan, Graeme M., et al.. (2021). The impact of tree loss on carbon management in West Africa. Carbon Management. 12(6). 623–633. 5 indexed citations
7.
Bradfer‐Lawrence, Tom, et al.. (2021). The potential contribution of terrestrial nature‐based solutions to a national ‘net zero’ climate target. Journal of Applied Ecology. 58(11). 2349–2360. 40 indexed citations
8.
Finch, Tom, Brett Day, Dario Massimino, et al.. (2020). Evaluating spatially explicit sharing‐sparing scenarios for multiple environmental outcomes. Journal of Applied Ecology. 58(3). 655–666. 26 indexed citations
9.
Field, Rob H., et al.. (2019). High contrast panels and lights do not reduce bird bycatch in Baltic Sea gillnet fisheries. Global Ecology and Conservation. 18. e00602–e00602. 37 indexed citations
10.
Firbank, L. G., John E. Elliott, Rob H. Field, et al.. (2018). Assessing the performance of commercial farms in England and Wales: Lessons for supporting the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Food and Energy Security. 7(4). 10 indexed citations
11.
Blaen, Phillip, Jia Li, Kelvin S.‐H. Peh, et al.. (2015). Rapid Assessment of Ecosystem Services Provided by Two Mineral Extraction Sites Restored for Nature Conservation in an Agricultural Landscape in Eastern England. PLoS ONE. 10(4). e0121010–e0121010. 15 indexed citations
12.
Field, Rob H., et al.. (2015). Making explicit agricultural ecosystem service trade-offs: a case study of an English lowland arable farm. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability. 14(3). 249–268. 9 indexed citations
13.
Burgess, Malcolm D., Antony J. Morris, Rob H. Field, et al.. (2014). Influence of agri-environment scheme options on territory settlement by Yellowhammer (Emberiza citronella) and Corn Bunting (Emberiza calandra). Journal für Ornithologie. 156(1). 153–163. 19 indexed citations
14.
Kaiser, Horst, et al.. (2013). The effects of competitor density on aggressive behaviour and resource defence in a Poeciliid fish. Journal of Applied Ichthyology. 29(6). 1264–1268. 3 indexed citations
15.
Sheldon, Rob, et al.. (2012). Breeding ecology of the globally threatened Sociable Lapwing Vanellus gregarius and the demographic drivers of recent declines. Journal für Ornithologie. 154(2). 501–516. 11 indexed citations
16.
Field, Rob H., Antony J. Morris, P. V. Grice, et al.. (2010). Evaluating the English Higher Level Stewardship scheme for farmland birds.. Aspects of applied biology. 59–68. 5 indexed citations
17.
Field, Rob H., et al.. (2010). The provision of winter bird food by the English Environmental Stewardship scheme. Ibis. 153(1). 14–26. 13 indexed citations
18.
Kuiper, Marcel, et al.. (2009). Fed-batch operation of an industrial cell culture process in shaken microwells. Biotechnology Letters. 32(1). 73–78. 34 indexed citations
19.
Field, Rob H. & Guy Q.A. Anderson. (2004). Habitat use by breeding Tree Sparrows Passer montanus. Ibis. 146(s2). 60–68. 39 indexed citations
20.
Gregory, Richard D., David G. Noble, Rob H. Field, et al.. (2003). Using birds as indicators of biodiversity. 158 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026