Peter Shih-Ping Hung

606 citations
21 papers · 460 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Shih-Ping Hung

20 papers receiving 457 citations

Peers

Peter Shih-Ping Hung
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 215
  • Neurology 94
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 11
  • Physiology 116
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 57
Replace Paul Nash with:
Paul Nash Australia
Niels Hansen Germany
Frauke Wolfram Denmark
Jenna M. Reeves Australia
Ruijie Ma China
Jasna Zidverc‐Trajkovic Serbia
A. Moglia Italy
Olga A. Korczeniewska United States
Nava Blumen Israel
T Juergens Germany
Peter Shih-Ping Hung relative to Paul Nash Australia Paul Nash's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Paul Nash · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Shih-Ping Hung

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Shih-Ping Hung's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Shih-Ping Hung with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Shih-Ping Hung more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Shih-Ping Hung

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Shih-Ping Hung. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Shih-Ping Hung. The network helps show where Peter Shih-Ping Hung may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Shih-Ping Hung, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Shih-Ping Hung Line = papers co-authored together Peter Shih-Ping Hung links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201768
2 202044
3 201843
4 201941
5 201536
6 202129
7 201929
8 201829
9 202125
10 202224
11 201920
12 201319
13 201616
14 201913
15 20227
16 20236
17 20215
18 20244
19 20241
20 20251

About Peter Shih-Ping Hung

Peter Shih-Ping Hung is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Physiology, Neurology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 21 papers that have together received 460 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Trigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments (13 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (5 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Facial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research (4 papers), Migraine and Headache Studies (2 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers) and Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (215 citations), Neurology (94 citations), Complementary and Manual Therapy (11 citations), Physiology (116 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (57 citations). Peter Shih-Ping Hung has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Mojgan Hodaie, jinyu zhong, Karen D. Davis, David Qixiang Chen, Sarasa Tohyama, Claire Magnussen, Alfredo Ribeiro‐da‐Silva, Normand Laperrière, Joshua C. Cheng and M. Walker. Their work appears in journals such as Pain, NeuroImage Clinical, Journal of neurosurgery, Human Mutation and PAIN Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact