NeuroImage Clinical

3.6k papers and 91.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.6k papers published in NeuroImage Clinical in the last decades have received a total of 91.9k indexed citations. Papers published in NeuroImage Clinical usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (1.8k papers), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (1.4k papers) and Psychiatry and Mental health (912 papers) specifically the topics of Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (1.3k papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (1.1k papers) and Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (448 papers). The most active scholars publishing in NeuroImage Clinical are R. Cameron Craddock, Vince D. Calhoun, Paul M. Thompson, Massimo Filippi, Frederik Barkhof, Clifford R. Jack, Felipe Meneguzzi, Augusto Buchweitz, Jian Kong and Joanna M. Wardlaw.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in NeuroImage Clinical

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in NeuroImage Clinical. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in NeuroImage Clinical.

Countries where authors publish in NeuroImage Clinical

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in NeuroImage Clinical. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in NeuroImage Clinical with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites NeuroImage Clinical more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025